Literature DB >> 10477012

Clinical and dosimetric predictors of radiation-induced esophageal toxicity.

P D Maguire1, G S Sibley, S M Zhou, T A Jamieson, K L Light, P A Antoine, J E Herndon, M S Anscher, L B Marks.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence, severity, and clinical/dosimetric predictors of acute and chronic esophageal toxicities in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with high-dose conformal thoracic radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ninety-one patients with localized NSCLC treated definitively with high-dose conformal radiation therapy (RT) at Duke University Medical Center (DUMC) were reviewed. Patient characteristics were as follows: 53 males and 38 females; median age 64 yr (range 46-82); stage I--16, II--3, IIIa--40, IIIb--30, X--2; dysphagia pre-RT--6 (7%). Treatment parameters included: median corrected dose-78.8 Gy (range 64.2-85.6); BID fractionation-58 (64%); chemotherapy-43 (47%). Acute and late esophageal toxicities were graded by RTOG criteria. Using 3D treatment planning tools, the esophagus was contoured in a uniform fashion, the 3D dose distribution calculated (with lung density correction), and the dose-volume (DVH) and dose-surface histograms (DSH) generated. At each axial level, the percentage of the esophageal circumference at each dose level was calculated. The length of circumferential esophagus and the maximum circumference treated to doses >50 Gy were assessed. Patient and treatment factors were correlated with acute and chronic esophageal dysfunction using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.
RESULTS: There were no acute or late grade 4 or 5 esophageal toxicities. Ten of 91 patients (11%) developed grade 3 acute toxicity. On univariate analysis of clinical parameters, both dysphagia pre-RT (p = 0.10) and BID fractionation (p = 0.11) tended toward significantly predicting grade 3 acute esophagitis. None of the dosimetric parameters analyzed significantly predicted for grade 3 acute esophagitis. Twelve of 66 assessable patients (18%) developed late esophageal toxicity. Of the clinical parameters analyzed, only dysphagia pre-RT (p = 0.06) tended toward significantly predicting late esophageal toxicity. On univariate analyses, the effects of percent organ volume treated >50 Gy (p = 0.05), percent surface area treated >50 Gy (p = 0.05), length of 100% circumference treated >50 Gy (p = 0.04), and maximum percent of circumference treated >80 Gy (p = 0.01) significantly predicted for late toxicity of all grades. On multivariate analysis, percent organ volume treated >50 Gy (p = 0.02) and maximum percent of circumference treated >80 Gy (p = 0.02) predicted for late toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS: Late esophageal toxicity following aggressive, high-dose conformal radiotherapy is common but rarely severe. Dosimetric variables addressing the longitudinal and circumferential character of the esophagus have biologic rationale and are predictive of late toxicity. Further studies are needed to assess whether these parameters are better predictors than those derived from traditional DVHs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10477012     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00163-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  29 in total

Review 1.  Lung cancer 5: state of the art radiotherapy for lung cancer.

Authors:  A Price
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Spanish radiobiological pattern of care in lung cancer: a GOECP/SEOR study.

Authors:  J A González; M Chust; R Delgado; A Gómez; N Rodríguez; M J Ruiz; F Casas
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Radiation dose-volume effects in the esophagus.

Authors:  Maria Werner-Wasik; Ellen Yorke; Joseph Deasy; Jiho Nam; Lawrence B Marks
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Pontine metastases as a cause of dysphagia in lung carcinoma.

Authors:  Alejandro Vara-Castrodeza; Juan Carlos Torrego-García; Javier Luis Puertas-Alvarez; Marcelino Mendo-González
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Dosimetric comparison of free-breathing and deep inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy for lung cancer.

Authors:  V Marchand; S Zefkili; J Desrousseaux; L Simon; C Dauphinot; P Giraud
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Digestive toxicities after palliative three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for cervico-thoracic spinal metastases.

Authors:  Guillaume Peyraga; Delphine Caron; Thibaut Lizee; Yann Metayer; Anne-Lise Septans; Yoann Pointreau; Fabrice Denis; Gerard Ganem; Cedrik Lafond; Sophie Roche; Olivier Dupuis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 7.  Esophagitis, treatment-related toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Voichita Bar-Ad; Nitin Ohri; Maria Werner-Wasik
Journal:  Rev Recent Clin Trials       Date:  2012-02

8.  Dosimetric factors associated with weight loss during (chemo)radiotherapy treatment for lung cancer.

Authors:  N Kiss; M Krishnasamy; S Everitt; K Gough; M Duffy; E Isenring
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Modeling the risk of radiation-induced acute esophagitis for combined Washington University and RTOG trial 93-11 lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Ellen X Huang; Jeffrey D Bradley; Issam El Naqa; Andrew J Hope; Patricia E Lindsay; Walter R Bosch; John W Matthews; William T Sause; Mary V Graham; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Scintigraphic evaluation of oesophageal transit during radiotherapy to the mediastinum.

Authors:  Giuseppe Sasso; Pierfrancesco Rambaldi; Francesco S Sasso; Vincenzo Cuccurullo; Paola Murino; Paolo Puntieri; Hugo R Marsiglia; Luigi Mansi
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.