Literature DB >> 10477000

Results of proton therapy of uveal melanomas treated in Nice.

A Courdi1, J P Caujolle, J D Grange, L Diallo-Rosier, J Sahel, F Bacin, C Zur, P Gastaud, N Iborra-Brassart, J Hérault, P Chauvel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present the first results of uveal melanomas treated with the Medicyc Cyclotron 65 MeV proton beam facility in Nice, analyzing the factors that affect the cause-specific survival (CSS), metastatic rate, and reporting the visual outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study concerns 538 patients referred by French institutions between June 1991 and December 1996. The eye and tumor parameters were measured using ultrasonography and angiography. Since 1994, CT scans were performed in most patients to help determine the axial length and the shape of the ocular globe. Tantalum clips were inserted around the tumor by the referring ophthalmologist. There were 349 posterior pole tumors (64.9%), 130 equatorial tumors (24.1%), and 59 ciliary body tumors (11%). Two hundred four patients (37.9%) had T1 or T2 tumors, and 334 patients (62.1%) had T3 or T4 tumors. The median tumor diameter was 14.6 mm, and the median tumor height was 5.1 mm. All patients received 52 Gy (57.20 Gy Co-equivalent dose) on 4 consecutive days. The data were analyzed by December 1997.
RESULTS: The CSS was 77.4% at 78 months, the overall survival was 73.8% and the local control was 89.0%. The CSS was not influenced by the patient age or the site of the tumor. It was 81.5% for T1 and T2 tumors, versus 75% for T3 and T4 tumors (P = 0.035). It was found that the tumor diameter, rather than the height, was the most important parameter affecting outcome. The metastatic rate was 8%. It depended on the T stage, tumor diameter and thickness, but not the tumor site. Thirty-eight enucleations were performed, most of them due to tumor progression and/or glaucoma. One-third of the patients in whom visual acuity was adequately scored before and after treatment had a stable, if not improved vision, and half the patients retained useful vision after treatment.
CONCLUSION: The outcome of patients suffering from uveal melanoma and treated with high-energy protons compares favorably with other techniques of treatment. The tumor dimensions affected CSS and metastatic rate. Even though two-thirds of patients had posterior pole tumors, half of them retained useful vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10477000     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00147-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  11 in total

Review 1.  Review of clinical experience with ion beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  A D Jensen; M W Münter; J Debus
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Endodrainage, Tumor Photocoagulation, and Silicone Oil Tamponade for Primary Exudative Retinal Detachment due to Choroidal Melanoma Persisting after Proton Beam Therapy.

Authors:  Ira Seibel; Dino Cordini; Gregor Willerding; Aline Isabel Riechardt; Antonia Maria Joussen
Journal:  Ocul Oncol Pathol       Date:  2014-07-22

3.  Combination of bevacizumab and irradiation on uveal melanoma: an in vitro and in vivo preclinical study.

Authors:  Anne Sudaka; Antoine Susini; Cristiana Lo Nigro; Jean-Louis Fischel; Nicolas Toussan; Patricia Formento; Federica Tonissi; Laura Lattanzio; Elvio Russi; Marie-Christine Etienne-Grimaldi; Marco Merlano; Gérard Milano
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 4.  The effectiveness and safety of proton radiation therapy for indications of the eye : a systematic review.

Authors:  Geertruida E Bekkering; Anne W S Rutjes; Vasiliy V Vlassov; Daniel M Aebersold; Konrade von Bremen; Peter Jüni; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Survival after primary enucleation for choroidal melanoma: changes induced by the introduction of conservative therapies.

Authors:  J Gambrelle; J D Grange; M Devouassoux Shisheboran; M Rivoire; L G Baggetto; B Jean-Louis; J Fleury; L Kodjikian
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.535

6.  Preliminary results of proton radiotherapy for choroidal melanoma - the Kraków experience.

Authors:  Beata Sas-Korczyńska; Anna Markiewicz; Bożena Romanowska-Dixon; Elżbieta Pluta
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2014-06-26

7.  Optimization of a general-purpose, actively scanned proton beamline for ocular treatments: Geant4 simulations.

Authors:  Pierluigi Piersimoni; Adele Rimoldi; Cristina Riccardi; Michele Pirola; Silvia Molinelli; Mario Ciocca
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Three-dimensional MRI-based treatment planning approach for non-invasive ocular proton therapy.

Authors:  E Fleury; P Trnková; E Erdal; M Hassan; B Stoel; M Jaarma-Coes; G Luyten; J Herault; A Webb; J-W Beenakker; J-P Pignol; M Hoogeman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-01-17       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  Non-Cancer Effects following Ionizing Irradiation Involving the Eye and Orbit.

Authors:  Juliette Thariat; Arnaud Martel; Alexandre Matet; Olivier Loria; Laurent Kodjikian; Anh-Minh Nguyen; Laurence Rosier; Joël Herault; Sacha Nahon-Estève; Thibaud Mathis
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Clinical Outcomes after International Referral of Uveal Melanoma Patients for Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Marina Marinkovic; Lennart J Pors; Vincent van den Berg; Femke P Peters; Ann Schalenbourg; Leonidas Zografos; Alessia Pica; Jan Hrbacek; Sjoerd G Van Duinen; T H Khanh Vu; Jaco C Bleeker; Coen R N Rasch; Martine J Jager; Gregorius P M Luyten; Nanda Horeweg
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.