Literature DB >> 10476605

The relationship between language-processing and visual-processing deficits in developmental dyslexia.

L Cestnick1, M Coltheart.   

Abstract

Some research on developmental dyslexia focuses on linguistic abnormalities such as poor reading of nonwords or poor reading of exception words. Other research focuses on visual abnormalities such as poor performance on psychophysical tasks believed to assess the functioning of the magnocellular and parvocellular layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN). Little is known about what the relationships are between these two types of abnormalities. We measured nonword reading, exception word reading, and performance with Ternus apparent movement displays (the perception of which is believed to depend upon the magnocellular and parvocellular pathways) in dyslexic children and children without reading difficulties. Our results indicate that performance on the Ternus task is related to nonword reading ability but not to exception word reading ability. We offer two alternative interpretations of these findings. According to the first of these, nonword reading requires a serial left-to-right allocation of covert attention across the letter string being read and the neural systems involved in this attentional process also play a part in responses to the Ternus display. According to the second, poor nonword reading and abnormal Ternus performance are not directly related: perinatal/neurodevelopmental insult has affected the LGN (influencing Ternus performance) and the adjacent medial geniculate nucleus (MGN; affecting phonological ability) and the MGN abnormalities may be more functionally related to poor nonword reading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10476605     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00023-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  19 in total

1.  Dynamic sensory sensitivity and children's word decoding skills.

Authors:  J B Talcott; C Witton; M F McLean; P C Hansen; A Rees; G G Green; J F Stein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Contrast responsivity in MT+ correlates with phonological awareness and reading measures in children.

Authors:  Michal Ben-Shachar; Robert F Dougherty; Gayle K Deutsch; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Subjective criteria and illusions in visual testing: some methodological limitations.

Authors:  Bernt C Skottun; John R Skoyles
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-02-12

4.  Attention modulates spatio-temporal grouping.

Authors:  Murat Aydın; Michael H Herzog; Haluk Oğmen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-23       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Visual attentional engagement deficits in children with specific language impairment and their role in real-time language processing.

Authors:  Marco Dispaldro; Laurence B Leonard; Nicola Corradi; Milena Ruffino; Tiziana Bronte; Andrea Facoetti
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Electrophysiological evidence for impaired attentional engagement with phonologically acceptable misspellings in developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Nicola J Savill; Guillaume Thierry
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-06-22

7.  A comparison of two-coloured filter systems for treating visual reading difficulties.

Authors:  Roger Hall; Nicola Ray; Priscilla Harries; John Stein
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 3.033

8.  Non-word reading, lexical retrieval and stuttering: comments on Packman, Onslow, Coombes and Goodwin (2001).

Authors:  James Au-Yeung; Peter Howell
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.346

9.  Encoding order and developmental dyslexia: a family of skills predicting different orthographic components.

Authors:  Cristina Romani; Effie Tsouknida; Andrew Olson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Spatial attention in written word perception.

Authors:  Veronica Montani; Andrea Facoetti; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.