Literature DB >> 10476138

Intravenous push medications in the home.

S M Poole1, A Nowobilski-Vasilios, F Free.   

Abstract

The intravenous push method for drug administration is not a new idea. In an era of quality, good patient outcomes, and cost efficiency it is important to look at economical and safe methods of drug delivery. This article reviews different methods of drug delivery and compares outcomes. The focus of the study was a comparison of minibag versus i.v. push drug delivery for anti-infective self-administration in the home setting. Case reports totalling 1116 from 50 sites were analyzed. The most frequently used drugs were ceftriaxone, cefazolin, and ceftazidime. Rates for all complications were 1.89/1000 catheter days for i.v. push and 1.69/1000 days for minibag delivery method. The phlebitis rate was 0.6/1000 catheter days for i.v. push and 0.79/1000 catheter days for minibag delivery method. Client satisfaction rates were comparable for all types of drug-delivery methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10476138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intraven Nurs        ISSN: 0896-5846


  3 in total

1.  Intravenous Push Administration of Antibiotics: Literature and Considerations.

Authors:  Samantha Spencer; Heather Ipema; Patricia Hartke; Courtney Krueger; Ryan Rodriguez; Alan E Gross; Michael Gabay
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2018-03-08

2.  Implementation of IV Push Antibiotics for Outpatients During a National Fluid Shortage Following Hurricane Maria.

Authors:  Kruti J Yagnik; L Steven Brown; Hala A Saad; Kristin Alvarez; Norman Mang; Cylaina E Bird; Fred Cerise; Kavita P Bhavan
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.835

3.  Cannula complications using elastomeric infusers in Hospital in the Home.

Authors:  Damian Ryan; Jennifer Miller; Joanne Campbell
Journal:  JAC Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2020-07-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.