Literature DB >> 10475476

Infection during circulatory support with ventricular assist devices.

W L Holman1, J L Skinner, K B Waites, R L Benza, D C McGiffin, J K Kirklin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study is a retrospective analysis of infections in patients supported by ventricular assist devices (VADs) as a bridge to cardiac transplantation.
METHODS: Infections were assigned to four classes. Class I were patient-related nonblood infections, class II were blood-borne infections, class III were percutaneous site infections, and class IV were infections of intracorporeal VAD components.
RESULTS: The cumulative number and incidence of infections were higher during the early VAD experience than in more recent patients (p < 0.05), although the cumulative number and incidence of class II and IV infections were similar in earlier and later patients. There were 28 serious (ie, class II and IV) infections in 9 patients who died, and 35 serious infections in 11 patients who survived until transplantation. Three of 4 patients with class IV infections died. A larger cumulative number of infections (ie, total class I-IV) was associated with more fungal isolates (p < 0.001) and more class II and IV infections (p < 0.02). Positive fungal cultures were obtained in 16 patients, but there were only 3 class III and 1 class IV fungal isolates.
CONCLUSIONS: Infection remains an important problem for patients with VADs. Bloodstream infections (class II) can often be controlled by appropriate therapy. However, intracorporeal device infections (class IV) are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Optimal implant techniques together with optimal wound care, appropriate use of prophylactic antibiotics, and avoidance of infection in indwelling catheters remain the most practical means for minimizing the risk of VAD infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10475476     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00529-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

1.  Mechanical circulatory support: expanding knowledge and experience in a challenging patient subset.

Authors:  W L Holman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Novel Left Ventricular Assist System: an electrocardiogram-synchronized LVAS that avoids cardiac cannulation.

Authors:  Domingo Liotta
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2003

Review 3.  Mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Deborah J Kozik; Mark D Plunkett
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Successful left ventricular assist device re-implantation with omental covering for MDRP device infection.

Authors:  Hitoshi Inafuku; Yukio Kuniyoshi; Satoshi Yamashiro; Yuichi Totsuka; Minoru Ono
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 1.731

5.  2019 EACTS Expert Consensus on long-term mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Evgenij V Potapov; Christiaan Antonides; Maria G Crespo-Leiro; Alain Combes; Gloria Färber; Margaret M Hannan; Marian Kukucka; Nicolaas de Jonge; Antonio Loforte; Lars H Lund; Paul Mohacsi; Michiel Morshuis; Ivan Netuka; Mustafa Özbaran; Federico Pappalardo; Anna Mara Scandroglio; Martin Schweiger; Steven Tsui; Daniel Zimpfer; Finn Gustafsson
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 6.  Screening of donor and recipient prior to solid organ transplantation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 8.086

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.