Literature DB >> 10475359

Sensitivity and specificity of sextant biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: preliminary report.

M K Terris1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the true-negative and false-negative rates of sextant prostate biopsies, the most common method of prostate cancer diagnosis.
METHODS: Forty-three men scheduled for prostatectomy as part of a surgical procedure for bladder pathologic findings agreed to participate in this study. All patients had normal digital rectal examination findings. Immediately before prostatectomy all patients underwent sextant biopsies. The location, amount, and Gleason grade of any cancer identified on the biopsies were recorded. After surgery, the prostate was serially sectioned. The location, grade, and volume of any prostatic adenocarcinoma identified was recorded and compared with the results of the biopsy specimens.
RESULTS: There were 33 patients without prostate cancer in either the biopsies or the prostatectomy specimen. No patients had cancer on the biopsies and no cancer in the prostatectomy specimen. In 6 patients, cancer was found in both the biopsies and the prostatectomy specimens; these cancers were 0.9, 2.1, 2.8, 3. 1, 4.2, and 6.5 cc in volume. In the remaining 4 patients, there was no cancer on the biopsies but the prostatectomy specimen revealed cancers of 0.05, 0.1, 0.3, and 2.5 cc. The overall sensitivity for sextant biopsies was 60.0%, with a specificity of 100%. When only cancers greater than 2 cc or cancers in the peripheral zone were considered, the sensitivity rose to 83.3% and 71.4%, respectively, with a minimal decrease in specificity (97.3% and 97.2%, respectively). In contrast, when transition zone cancers were evaluated, the sensitivity fell to 33.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: Sextant biopsies are fairly sensitive for the detection of tumors greater than 2 cc and those in the peripheral zone; however, repeat biopsies should be strongly considered in patients with a high clinical suspicion for prostate cancer and negative initial sextant biopsies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10475359     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00148-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  11 in total

Review 1.  A comparison of the diagnostic performance of systematic versus ultrasound-guided biopsies of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Hilco van Moerkerk; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; J Alfred Witjes; Ferdinand Frauscher; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Design of a novel MRI compatible manipulator for image guided prostate interventions.

Authors:  Axel Krieger; Robert C Susil; Cynthia Ménard; Jonathan A Coleman; Gabor Fichtinger; Ergin Atalar; Louis L Whitcomb
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Design and preliminary accuracy studies of an MRI-guided transrectal prostate intervention system.

Authors:  Axel Krieger; Csaba Csoma; Iulian I Iordachital; Peter Guion; Anurag K Singh; Gabor Fichtinger; Louis L Whitcomb
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2007

4.  Endoclipping treatment of life-threatening rectal bleeding after prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Panagiotis Katsinelos; Jannis Kountouras; Georgios Dimitriadis; Grigoris Chatzimavroudis; Christos Zavos; Ioannis Pilpilidis; George Paroutoglou; George Germanidis; Kostas Mimidis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Safety and Feasibility of Direct Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Using a Novel Magnetic Resonance Imaging-safe Robotic Device.

Authors:  Mark W Ball; Ashley E Ross; Kamyar Ghabili; Chunwoo Kim; Changhan Jun; Doru Petrisor; Li Pan; Jonathan I Epstein; Katarzyna J Macura; Dan S Stoianovici; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  MR imaging-guided interventions in the genitourinary tract: an evolving concept.

Authors:  Fiona M Fennessy; Kemal Tuncali; Paul R Morrison; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 7.  MR imaging-guided interventions in the genitourinary tract: an evolving concept.

Authors:  Fiona M Fennessy; Kemal Tuncali; Paul R Morrison; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Fluorescence time-resolved imaging system embedded in an ultrasound prostate probe.

Authors:  Aurélie Laidevant; Lionel Hervé; Mathieu Debourdeau; Jérôme Boutet; Nicolas Grenier; Jean-Marc Dinten
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Clinical relevance of genetic instability in prostatic cells obtained by prostatic massage in early prostate cancer.

Authors:  R Thuret; K Chantrel-Groussard; A-R Azzouzi; J-M Villette; S Guimard; P Teillac; P Berthon; A Houlgatte; A Latil; O Cussenot
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-01-31       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  MR-targeted TRUS prostate biopsy using local reference augmentation: initial experience.

Authors:  Wendy J M van de Ven; Wulphert Venderink; J P Michiel Sedelaar; Jeroen Veltman; Jelle O Barentsz; Jurgen J Fütterer; Erik B Cornel; Henkjan J Huisman
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.