Literature DB >> 10475357

Comparison of once and twice daily dosage forms of Pygeum africanum extract in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized, double-blind study, with long-term open label extension.

C Chatelain1, W Autet, F Brackman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of Pygeum africanum extract, 50 mg twice daily and 100 mg once daily.
METHODS: Patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) entered a 2-month randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, comparative phase (group A, 50 mg twice daily; group B, 100 mg once daily), followed by a 10-month, open phase (100 mg once daily). Main efficacy assessment parameters included International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL), and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax).
RESULTS: Two hundred nine patients completed the comparative phase in compliance with the protocol; 174 were included in the open phase. Both treatments had similar efficacy. IPSS (baseline 17 in both groups) improved by 38% in group A and 35% in group B. QOL improved by 28% in both groups. Qmax increased by 1.63 mL/s (16%) in group A and 2.02 mL/s (19%) in group B. After 12 months, the IPSS fell from 16 (baseline) to 9 (-46%). Half of the patients had an IPSS below 8. Mean Qmax increased by 1.65 mUs (15%). The safety profile was similar between groups and study phases.
CONCLUSIONS: P. africanum extract at 50 mg twice daily and 100 mg once daily proved equally effective and safe at 2 months. Further improvements in efficacy with a satisfactory safety profile were documented after 12 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10475357     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00147-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  8 in total

Review 1.  What patients take without telling you: holistic approach for BPH.

Authors:  Jillian L Capodice; Aaron E Katz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Pygeum africanum for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  T Wilt; A Ishani; R Mac Donald; I Rutks; G Stark
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002

Review 3.  [Treatment of LUTS in BPS. When and when not to administer pills?].

Authors:  R Berges
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Prunus africana (Hook.f.) Kalkman: the overexploitation of a medicinal plant species and its legal context.

Authors:  Gerard Bodeker; Charlotte van 't Klooster; Emma Weisbord
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 2.579

Review 5.  Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Could Dietary Polyphenols Be an Alternative to Existing Therapies?

Authors:  Chinedum Eleazu; Kate Eleazu; Winner Kalu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 6.  Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia by Natural Drugs.

Authors:  Eszter Csikós; Adrienn Horváth; Kamilla Ács; Nóra Papp; Viktória Lilla Balázs; Marija Sollner Dolenc; Maša Kenda; Nina Kočevar Glavač; Milan Nagy; Michele Protti; Laura Mercolini; Györgyi Horváth; Ágnes Farkas
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Outcomes and quality of life issues in the pharmacological management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Authors:  Angelo J Cambio; Christopher P Evans
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 8.  Pharmacology of the lower urinary tract: update on LUTS treatment.

Authors:  Pedro Abreu-Mendes; João Silva; Francisco Cruz
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2020-05-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.