Literature DB >> 10475286

Reduction of blood loss and transfusion requirement by aprotinin in posterior lumbar spine fusion.

C Lentschener1, P Cottin, H Bouaziz, F J Mercier, M Wolf, Y Aljabi, C Boyer-Neumann, D Benhamou.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Aprotinin reduces blood loss in many orthopedic procedures. In posterior lumbar spine fusion, blood loss results primarily from large vein bleeding and also occurs after the wound is closed. Seventy-two patients undergoing posterior lumbar spine fusion were randomly assigned to large-dose aprotinin therapy or placebo. All patients donated three units of packed red blood cells (RBCs) preoperatively. Postoperative blood loss was harvested from the surgical wound in patients undergoing two- and/or three-level fusion for reinfusion. The target hematocrit for RBC transfusion was 26% if tolerated. Total (intraoperative and 24 h postoperative) blood loss, transfusion requirements, and percentage of transfused patients per treatment group were significantly smaller in the aprotinin group than in the placebo group (1935 +/- 873 vs 2809 +/- 973 mL per patient [P = 0.007]; 42 vs 95 packed RBCs per group [P = 0.001]; 40% vs 81% per group [P = 0.02]). Hematological assessments showed an identically significant (a) intraoperative increase in both thrombin-antithrombin III complexes (TAT) and in activated factor XII (XIIa) and (b) decrease in activated factor VII (VIIa), indicating a similar significant effect on coagulation in patients of both groups (P = 0.9 for intergroup comparisons of postoperative VIIa, XIIa, and TAT). Intraoperative activation of fibrinolysis was significantly less pronounced in the aprotinin group than in the placebo group (P < 0.0001 for intergroup comparison of postoperative D-dimer levels). No adverse drug effects (circulatory disturbances, deep venous thrombosis, alteration of serum creatinine) were detected. Although administered intraoperatively, aprotinin treatment dramatically reduced intraoperative and 24-h postoperative blood loss and autologous transfusion requirements but did not change homologous transfusion in posterior lumbar spine fusion. IMPLICATIONS: In our study, aprotinin therapy significantly decreased autologous, but not homologous, transfusion requirements in posterior lumbar spine fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10475286     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199909000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  15 in total

Review 1.  What is the evidence for using hemostatic agents in surgery?

Authors:  Brian L Erstad
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Aprotinin and major orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Charles Marc Samama
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-07-02       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Efficacy and cost effectiveness of harmonic scalpel compared with electrocautery in posterior instrumentation of the spine.

Authors:  Balkan Cakir; Benjamin Ulmar; René Schmidt; Georg Kelsch; Peter Geiger; Hans-Hinrich Mehrkens; Wolfhart Puhl; Marcus Richter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  An overview of blood-sparing techniques used in spine surgery during the perioperative period.

Authors:  Marek Szpalski; Robert Gunzburg; Bernard Sztern
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Letter to the Editor concerning "Comparison of blood loss according to use of aspirin in lumbar fusion patients" (by Park HJ, Kwon KY, Woo JH (2014) Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3294-y).

Authors:  Liang Ding; Zhimin He; Haijun Xiao; Feng Xue
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Antifibrinolytic agents for reducing blood loss in scoliosis surgery in children.

Authors:  Ewan D McNicol; Aikaterini Tzortzopoulou; Roman Schumann; Daniel B Carr; Aman Kalra
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-19

Review 7.  Pharmacological strategies to decrease transfusion requirements in patients undergoing surgery.

Authors:  Robert J Porte; Frank W G Leebeek
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion.

Authors:  David A Henry; Paul A Carless; Annette J Moxey; Dianne O'Connell; Barrie J Stokes; Dean A Fergusson; Katharine Ker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-03-16

Review 9.  Efficacy of antifibrinolytic agents on surgical bleeding and transfusion requirements in spine surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guang Li; Tian-Wei Sun; Gan Luo; Chao Zhang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  A benefit-risk review of systemic haemostatic agents: part 1: in major surgery.

Authors:  Ian S Fraser; Robert J Porte; Peter A Kouides; Andrea S Lukes
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.