Literature DB >> 10474765

Cancer patients' expectations of the role of family physicians in communication about complementary therapies.

M J Verhoef1, M A White, R Doll.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore cancer patients' experiences with and expectations of the role of family physicians in communication about complementary therapies.
DESIGN: Focus group interviews.
SETTING: British Columbia Cancer Agency and the University of Calgary. PARTICIPANTS: Sample of 14 cancer patients using complementary therapies comprising 3 focus groups (2 in BC and 1 in Alberta).
RESULTS: The role of family physicians in discussing complementary therapies varied from being extraneous to patients' decision making to being a partner in making decisions about cancer treatments. Patients expected their physicians to be supportive, caring, kind and to show an interest in them. They also expected their physicians to be accepting and nonjudgmental regarding complementary therapy use and to reinforce a sense of hope. Most patients did not expect their doctors to have extensive knowledge about these therapies. All patients strongly felt the need to seek information themselves. In addition, they felt that believing in the type of therapies they were using was very important.
CONCLUSION: Family physicians can play an important role in exploring and discussing complementary therapies with their patients. It is important that they are made aware of their patients' needs in this area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10474765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Control        ISSN: 1206-548X


  8 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for improving older patients' involvement in primary care episodes.

Authors:  R Wetzels; M Harmsen; C Van Weel; R Grol; M Wensing
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-01-24

2.  Relationships among older patients, CAM practitioners, and physicians: the advantages of qualitative inquiry.

Authors:  Shelley R Adler
Journal:  Altern Ther Health Med       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.305

3.  Association of shared decision-making with type of breast cancer surgery: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Myung Kyung Lee; Dong Young Noh; Seok Jin Nam; Se Hyun Ahn; Byeong Woo Park; Eun Sook Lee; Young Ho Yun
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 4.  Effective communication about the use of complementary and integrative medicine in cancer care.

Authors:  Moshe Frenkel; Lorenzo Cohen
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.579

5.  Teaching complementary medicine at an academic oncology department.

Authors:  Eran Ben-Arye; Moshe Frenkel; Gil Bar-Sela; Ruth Stashefsky Margalit; Doron Hermoni; Abraham Kuten
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Complementary therapy use by cancer patients. Physicians' perceptions, attitudes, and ideas.

Authors:  Maeve O'Beirne; Marja Verhoef; Elan Paluck; Carol Herbert
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Development and Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Attitudes and Beliefs about Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Use among Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Jun J Mao; Steve C Palmer; Krupali Desai; Susan Q Li; Katrina Armstrong; Sharon X Xie
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 8.  Decision-making about complementary and alternative medicine by cancer patients: integrative literature review.

Authors:  Laura Weeks; Lynda G Balneaves; Charlotte Paterson; Marja Verhoef
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2014-04-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.