OBJECTIVES: This study examined whether HIV counseling and testing leads to reductions in sexual risk behavior. METHODS: The meta-analysis included 27 published studies that provided sexual behavior outcome data, assessed behavior before and after counseling and testing, and provided details sufficient for the calculation of effect sizes. The studies involved 19,597 participants. RESULTS: After counseling and testing, HIV-positive participants and HIV-serodiscordant couples reduced unprotected intercourse and increased condom use more than HIV-negative and untested participants. HIV-negative participants did not modify their behavior more than untested participants. Participants' age, volition for testing, and injection drug use treatment status, as well as the sample seroprevalence and length of the follow-up, explained the variance in results. CONCLUSIONS: HIV counseling and testing appears to provide an effective means of secondary prevention for HIV-positive individuals but, as conducted in the reviewed studies, is not an effective primary prevention strategy for uninfected participants. Theory-driven research with attention given to the context of testing is needed to further explicate the determinants of behavior change resulting from HIV counseling and testing, and the effectiveness of specific counseling approaches.
OBJECTIVES: This study examined whether HIV counseling and testing leads to reductions in sexual risk behavior. METHODS: The meta-analysis included 27 published studies that provided sexual behavior outcome data, assessed behavior before and after counseling and testing, and provided details sufficient for the calculation of effect sizes. The studies involved 19,597 participants. RESULTS: After counseling and testing, HIV-positive participants and HIV-serodiscordant couples reduced unprotected intercourse and increased condom use more than HIV-negative and untested participants. HIV-negative participants did not modify their behavior more than untested participants. Participants' age, volition for testing, and injection drug use treatment status, as well as the sample seroprevalence and length of the follow-up, explained the variance in results. CONCLUSIONS: HIV counseling and testing appears to provide an effective means of secondary prevention for HIV-positive individuals but, as conducted in the reviewed studies, is not an effective primary prevention strategy for uninfected participants. Theory-driven research with attention given to the context of testing is needed to further explicate the determinants of behavior change resulting from HIV counseling and testing, and the effectiveness of specific counseling approaches.
Authors: G J van Griensven; E M de Vroome; R A Tielman; J Goudsmit; F de Wolf; J van der Noordaa; R A Coutinho Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1989-03 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: G J van Griensven; E M de Vroome; R A Tielman; J Goudsmit; J van der Noordaa; F de Wolf; R A Coutinho Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1988-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: M T Schechter; K J Craib; B Willoughby; B Douglas; W A McLeod; M Maynard; P Constance; M O'Shaughnessy Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1988-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: M J Rotheram-Borus; M B Lee; D A Murphy; D Futterman; N Duan; J M Birnbaum; M Lightfoot Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: E Wood; M W Tyndall; P M Spittal; K Li; T Kerr; R S Hogg; J S Montaner; M V O'Shaughnessy; M T Schechter Journal: CMAJ Date: 2001-08-21 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Dolores Albarracín; Penny S McNatt; Cynthia T F Klein; Ringo M Ho; Amy L Mitchell; G Tarcan Kumkale Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Kathleen J Sikkema; Laurie Abler; Nathan B Hansen; Patrick A Wilson; Anya S Drabkin; Arlene Kochman; Jessica C MacFarlane; Allyson DeLorenzo; Gal Mayer; Melissa H Watt; William Nazareth Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2014-09
Authors: Blair T Johnson; Michael P Carey; Stephenie R Chaudoir; Allecia E Reid Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2006-04-15 Impact factor: 3.731