Literature DB >> 10474550

The public's view of the competence, dangerousness, and need for legal coercion of persons with mental health problems.

B A Pescosolido1, J Monahan, B G Link, A Stueve, S Kikuzawa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The authors examined Americans' opinions about financial and treatment competence of people with mental health problems, potential for harm to self or others, and the use of legal means to force treatment.
METHODS: The 1996 General Social Survey provided interview data with a nationally representative sample (n = 1444). Respondents were given a vignette based on diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia, major depression, alcohol dependence, or drug dependence, or a "control" case.
RESULTS: The specific nature of the problem was the most important factor shaping public reaction. Respondents viewed those with "troubles," alcohol dependence, or depression as able to make treatment decisions. Most reported that persons with alcohol or drug problems or schizophrenia cannot manage money and are likely to be violent toward others. Respondents indicated a willingness to coerce individuals into treatment. Respondent and other case characteristics rarely affected opinions.
CONCLUSIONS: Americans report greater concern with individuals who have drug or alcohol problems than with persons who have other mental health problems. Evaluations of dangerousness and coercion indicate a continuing need for public education.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Mental Health Therapies; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10474550      PMCID: PMC1508769          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  7 in total

1.  The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. III: Abilities of patients to consent to psychiatric and medical treatments.

Authors:  Thomas Grisso; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  1995-04

2.  Mental disorder and violent behavior. Perceptions and evidence.

Authors:  J Monahan
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1992-04

Review 3.  Coercion and commitment: understanding involuntary mental hospital admission.

Authors:  J Monahan; S K Hoge; C Lidz; L H Roth; N Bennett; W Gardner; E Mulvey
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  1995

4.  How people get into mental health services: stories of choice, coercion and "muddling through" from "first-timers".

Authors:  B A Pescosolido; C B Gardner; K M Lubell
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Violence by people discharged from acute psychiatric inpatient facilities and by others in the same neighborhoods.

Authors:  H J Steadman; E P Mulvey; J Monahan; P C Robbins; P S Appelbaum; T Grisso; L H Roth; E Silver
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1998-05

6.  Public conceptions of mental illness: labels, causes, dangerousness, and social distance.

Authors:  B G Link; J C Phelan; M Bresnahan; A Stueve; B A Pescosolido
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Comparison of standards for assessing patients' capacities to make treatment decisions.

Authors:  T Grisso; P S Appelbaum
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 18.112

  7 in total
  79 in total

1.  Measuring community preferences for public mental health services: pilot test of a mail survey method.

Authors:  Martha Shumway; George J Unick; William A McConnell; Ralph Catalano; Peter Forster
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2004-08

2.  [Bremen Risk Assessment Scale for General Psychiatry. Predicting violent behavior in mentally ill patients discharged from general psychiatry].

Authors:  S von Berg; H Haselbeck; D Handschuh; J Timm
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Mental health consumer-operated services organizations in the US: citizenship as a core function and strategy for growth.

Authors:  Sandra J Tanenbaum
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2011-06

4.  Changes in Mental Illness Stigma in California During the Statewide Stigma and Discrimination Reduction Initiative.

Authors:  Rebecca L Collins; Eunice C Wong; Elizabeth Roth; Jennifer L Cerully; Joyce Marks
Journal:  Rand Health Q       Date:  2015-11-30

5.  Violence and mental illness: an overview.

Authors:  Heather Stuart
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 49.548

6.  Chinese and American employers' perspectives regarding hiring people with behaviorally driven health conditions: the role of stigma.

Authors:  Patrick W Corrigan; Hector W H Tsang; Kan Shi; Chow S Lam; Jon Larson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Factors associated with perceived stigma for alcohol use and treatment among at-risk drinkers.

Authors:  John Fortney; Snigdha Mukherjee; Geoffrey Curran; Stacy Fortney; Xiaotong Han; Brenda M Booth
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.505

Review 8.  The public stigma of mental illness: what do we think; what do we know; what can we prove?

Authors:  Bernice A Pescosolido
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2013-01-16

9.  Does a Physician's Attitude toward a Patient with Mental Illness Affect Clinical Management of Diabetes? Results from a Mixed-Method Study.

Authors:  Lisa C Welch; Heather J Litman; Christina P C Borba; Brenda Vincenzi; David C Henderson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 10.  Acceptability of compulsory powers in the community: the ethical considerations of mental health service users on Supervised Discharge and Guardianship.

Authors:  K Canvin; A Bartlett; V Pinfold
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.903

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.