Literature DB >> 10474124

A comparison between octreotide-LAR and lanreotide-SR in the chronic treatment of acromegaly.

R Cozzi1, D Dallabonzana, R Attanasio, M Barausse, G Oppizzi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: At present long-acting somatostatin analogs represent the first-line medical treatment of acromegaly. These drugs produce stable suppression of GH in most sensitive patients and IGF-I normalization in many; they also increase the compliance of acromegalic patients. The recent availability of octreotide (OC)-LAR, a somatostatin analog to be administered at 28-day intervals, has prompted us to compare, in the same group of patients, its effects and those of another somatostatin analog already available, lanreotide-SR (LSR, to be administered at 14-day intervals). PATIENTS: Twelve somatostatin analog-sensitive acromegalic patients with active disease were enrolled in a prospective open sequential study after giving their informed consent. After chronic treatment with LSR (6-24 months), the patients were changed to treatment with OC-LAR, without wash-out. LSR had been administered at individually tailored dosages (30 mg i.m. at 7-21-day intervals, median 10 days - every 7 days in seven patients, 10 days in two patients, 14 days in two patients and 21 days in one patient) according to GH and IGF-I responses. Disease stability was obtained, as shown by maximal GH/IGF-I suppression without any significant hormonal change between the last two control measurements. OC-LAR was administered i.m. at 28-day intervals six times at the dosage of 20 mg for the first three times and 10 or 30 mg for the last three times (according to individual GH/IGF-I responses). GH (mean of three, hourly samples) and IGF-I concentrations were evaluated on the same day as each administration of the drug, before its injection.
RESULTS: GH and IGF-I values were significantly decreased by LSR treatment. GH decreased from 41.6 +/- 14.6 microg/l (mean +/- s.e.) to 7.2 +/- 1.5 microg/l (P < 0.02), whereas IGF-I values declined from 959 +/- 95 microg/l to 460 +/- 61 microg/l (P < 0.00001), expressed as absolute values, and from 287 +/- 30% to 137 +/- 19% expressed as percentage of the upper limit of normal range (% ULNR). At the end of the last cycle, OC-LAR treatment achieved a significant further suppression both in GH (to 5.1 +/- 1.1 microg/l, P < 0.05 compared with LSR) and in IGF-I concentrations (to 374 +/- 60 microg/l, P<0.05 compared with LSR, and to 112 +/- 19% as % ULNR). LSR decreased GH concentrations to less than 2.5 microg/l in one patient and normalized IGF-I concentrations in four patients. OC-LAR decreased GH concentrations to less than 2.5 microg/l in four patients and normalized or near-normalized IGF-I concentrations (i.e. to < 110% ULNR) in eight patients.
CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results show that the once-monthly OC-LAR administration schedule proved more efficacious than LSR given every 7-21 days, in a greater number of acromegalic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10474124     DOI: 10.1530/eje.0.1410267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol        ISSN: 0804-4643            Impact factor:   6.664


  14 in total

Review 1.  Somatostatin agonists for treatment of acromegaly.

Authors:  Anat Ben-Shlomo; Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 4.102

Review 2.  Acromegaly.

Authors:  Anat Ben-Shlomo; Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.741

Review 3.  Octreotide long-acting release (LAR): a review of its use in the management of acromegaly.

Authors:  Lily P H Yang; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Pharmacotherapy or surgery as primary treatment for acromegaly?

Authors:  D Ferone; A Colao; A J van der Lely; S W Lamberts
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Guidelines for the treatment of growth hormone excess and growth hormone deficiency in adults.

Authors:  A Giustina; A Barkan; P Chanson; A Grossman; A Hoffman; E Ghigo; F Casanueva; A Colao; S Lamberts; M Sheppard; S Melmed
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Effects of two different somatostatin analogs on glucose tolerance in acromegaly.

Authors:  C Ronchi; P Epaminonda; V Cappiello; P Beck-Peccoz; M Arosio
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Efficacy of long-term lanreotide treatment in patients with acromegaly.

Authors:  Yoel Toledano; Liat Rot; Yona Greenman; Sophia Orlovsky; Yulia Pauker; David Olchovsky; Achia Eliash; Orit Bardicef; Ofa Makhoul; Gloria Tsvetov; Michal Gershinsky; Odile Cohen-Ouaqnine; Rosane Ness-Abramof; Zaina Adnan; Jacob Ilany; Hadassah Guttmann; Mazal Sapir; Carlos Benbassat; Ilan Shimon
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 8.  Octreotide long-acting release (LAR): a review of its use in the management of acromegaly.

Authors:  Kate McKeage; Susan Cheer; Antona J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Current status and future opportunities for controlling acromegaly.

Authors:  Shlomo Melmed; Mary Lee Vance; Ariel L Barkan; Bengt-Ake Bengtsson; David Kleinberg; Anne Klibanski; Peter J Trainer
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.107

10.  Therapeutic options in the management of acromegaly: focus on lanreotide Autogel.

Authors:  Ferdinand Roelfsema; Nienke R Biermasz; Alberto M Pereira; Johannes A Romijn
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2008-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.