Literature DB >> 10474097

Biomechanical considerations in distraction of the osteotomized dentomaxillary complex.

J G Ahn1, A A Figueroa, S Braun, J W Polley.   

Abstract

The completely osteotomized dentomaxillary complex is essentially a free body constrained only by its soft tissue attachments. Therefore the line of action and point of application of any protractive force(s) used during distraction osteogenesis must be considered relative to its center of mass. This is in contrast to the nonsurgically separated dentomaxillary complex, which is a constrained body, and therefore the application of protractive force(s) must be considered relative to its center of resistance. These two centers are not coincident. With knowledge of the location of the center of mass, predictable protraction of the dentomaxillary complex can be achieved. In this study, the center of mass of an adult maxillary specimen osteotomized to emulate a Le Fort I osteotomy was determined. Protractive force(s) through the center of mass will produce linear advancement along its line of action. Protractive movement of the dentomaxillary complex can be adjusted downward and forward or upward and forward by locating the protractive force(s) line of action superior or inferior to the center of mass. A cleft patient is described wherein the surgically separated dentomaxillary complex is protracted downward and forward with a force vector superior to its approximate center of mass. This results in a predictable increase in overbite and overjet with negligible mandibular rotation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10474097     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70236-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  3 in total

1.  An interview with Alvaro Alfredo Figueroa.

Authors:  Alvaro Alfredo Figueroa; Eduardo Franzotti Sant'Anna; Mônica Tirre de Souza Araujo; Geórgia Wain Thi Lau; Lúcio Henrique E G Maia
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

2.  Evaluation of the hard and soft tissue changes after maxillary advancement with rigid external distractor in unilateral cleft lip and palate induced maxillary hypoplasia.

Authors:  N K Sahoo; B Jayan; I D Roy; Ajay Desai
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2014-03-12

3.  Biomechanical comparison of two intraoperative mobilization techniques for maxillary distraction osteogenesis: Down-fracture versus non-down-fracture.

Authors:  Lili Yang; Eduardo Yugo Suzuki; Boonsiva Suzuki
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Dec
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.