Literature DB >> 10473800

Human semen quality in relation to dietary pesticide exposure and organic diet.

R K Juhler1, S B Larsen, O Meyer, N D Jensen, M Spanò, A Giwercman, J P Bonde.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to corroborate or refute the hypothesis that farmers having a high intake of organic grown commodities have a high semen quality due to their expected lower level of dietary pesticides intake. Food frequency data and semen were collected from 256 farmers (171 traditional farmers and 85 organic farmers, overall participation rate: 32%) who were selected from central registers. Each farmer delivered one semen sample before the spraying season started. The farmers were divided into three groups where the commodities from organic production contributed no (N, 0%), medium (M, 1-49%), or a high (H, 50-100%) proportion of the fruit and vegetables consumed. Farmers having a high relative intake of organically grown fruit and vegetables also had a high relative consumption of organically produced meat, milk, and bread, and differences were observed comparing the actual mean intake of single commodities, such as rice, potato, and pork meat. The current individual dietary intake of 40 pesticides was estimated using food frequencies and generalized serving size data in combination with data on pesticide concentrations in food commodities as obtained from the National Danish Food Monitoring Program. The estimated pesticide intake was significantly lower among farmers of group H, but for all three groups of farmers the average dietary intake of 40 pesticides was at or below 1% of the acceptable daily intake (ADI) except for the dithiocarbamates (max = 0.21 microg/kg day = 2.2% ADI), methidathion, (max = 0.01 microg/kg day = 1.4% ADI), and 2-phenylphenol (max = 0.21 microg/kg day = 1.1% ADI). The median sperm concentration for the three groups of farmers was not significantly different (p = 0.40, median sperm concentration was N = 62, M = 44, and H = 75 million/ml). The group of men without organic food intake had a significant lower proportion of morphologically normal spermatozoa, but in relation to 14 other semen parameters no significant differences were found between the groups. Intake of 40 individual pesticides was correlated with four semen parameters (concentration, percentage dead spermatozoa, percentage normal sperm heads, and motility [VCL]). Five significant correlations (p value 0.01) were found among the 160 comparisons in relation to percentage dead spermatozoa: azinphos-methyl, carbaryl, chlorfenson, fenitrothion, and tetradifon. For all of them a lower percentage of dead spermatozoa were found in the groups with a high dietary intake of the specific pesticide. In contrast, for all pesticides evaluated only minor differences were found between the groups when considering spermatozoa concentration, morphology, and motility. In conclusion, the estimated dietary intake of 40 pesticides did not entail a risk of impaired semen quality, but precautions should be taken when generalizing this negative result to populations with a higher dietary exposure level or an intake of other groups of pesticides.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10473800     DOI: 10.1007/s002449900533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0090-4341            Impact factor:   2.804


  8 in total

1.  Fruit and vegetable intake and their pesticide residues in relation to semen quality among men from a fertility clinic.

Authors:  Y H Chiu; M C Afeiche; A J Gaskins; P L Williams; J C Petrozza; C Tanrikut; R Hauser; J E Chavarro
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Passing experiences on to future generations: endocrine disruptors and transgenerational inheritance of epimutations in brain and sperm.

Authors:  Ross Gillette; Min Ji Son; Lexi Ton; Andrea C Gore; David Crews
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.528

3.  Changing patterns of organochlorine pesticide residues in raw bovine milk from Haryana, India.

Authors:  C P Kaushik; Hardeep Rai Sharma; Deepak Gulati; Anubha Kaushik
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 4.  Endocrine disrupting chemicals and disease susceptibility.

Authors:  Thaddeus T Schug; Amanda Janesick; Bruce Blumberg; Jerrold J Heindel
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 4.292

5.  Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farming.

Authors:  Carla Costa; Julia García-Lestón; Solange Costa; Patrícia Coelho; Susana Silva; Marta Pingarilho; Vanessa Valdiglesias; Francesca Mattei; Valentina Dall'Armi; Stefano Bonassi; Blanca Laffon; John Snawder; João Paulo Teixeira
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 4.372

Review 6.  Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: an Endocrine Society scientific statement.

Authors:  Evanthia Diamanti-Kandarakis; Jean-Pierre Bourguignon; Linda C Giudice; Russ Hauser; Gail S Prins; Ana M Soto; R Thomas Zoeller; Andrea C Gore
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 7.  Similar causes of various reproductive disorders in early life.

Authors:  Konstantin Svechnikov; Jan-Bernd Stukenborg; Iuliia Savchuck; Olle Söder
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

8.  A Systematic Review of Organic Versus Conventional Food Consumption: Is There a Measurable Benefit on Human Health?

Authors:  Vanessa Vigar; Stephen Myers; Christopher Oliver; Jacinta Arellano; Shelley Robinson; Carlo Leifert
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 5.717

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.