Literature DB >> 10473455

Impact of rpoS deletion on Escherichia coli biofilms.

J L Adams1, R J McLean.   

Abstract

Slow growth has been hypothesized to be an essential aspect of bacterial physiology within biofilms. In order to test this hypothesis, we employed two strains of Escherichia coli, ZK126 (DeltalacZ rpoS(+)) and its isogenic DeltarpoS derivative, ZK1000. These strains were grown at two rates (0.033 and 0.0083 h(-1)) in a glucose-limited chemostat which was coupled either to a modified Robbins device containing plugs of silicone rubber urinary catheter material or to a glass flow cell. The presence or absence of rpoS did not significantly affect planktonic growth of E. coli. In contrast, biofilm cell density in the rpoS mutant strain (ZK1000), as measured by determining the number of CFU per square centimeter, was reduced by 50% (P < 0.05). Deletion of rpoS caused differences in biofilm cell arrangement, as seen by scanning confocal laser microscopy. In reporter gene experiments, similar levels of rpoS expression were seen in chemostat-grown planktonic and biofilm populations at a growth rate of 0.033 h(-1). Overall, these studies suggest that rpoS is important for biofilm physiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10473455      PMCID: PMC99780     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  13 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory techniques for studying biofilm growth, physiology, and gene expression in flowing systems and porous media.

Authors:  R J McLean; M Whiteley; B C Hoskins; P D Majors; M M Sharma
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Stationary-phase-inducible "gearbox" promoters: differential effects of katF mutations and role of sigma 70.

Authors:  D E Bohannon; N Connell; J Keener; A Tormo; M Espinosa-Urgel; M M Zambrano; R Kolter
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Use of rRNA fluorescence in situ hybridization for measuring the activity of single cells in young and established biofilms.

Authors:  L K Poulsen; G Ballard; D A Stahl
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Susceptibility of bacterial biofilms to tobramycin: role of specific growth rate and phase in the division cycle.

Authors:  D J Evans; M R Brown; D G Allison; P Gilbert
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Gene expression from plasmids containing the araBAD promoter at subsaturating inducer concentrations represents mixed populations.

Authors:  D A Siegele; J C Hu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Activity and three-dimensional distribution of toluene-degrading Pseudomonas putida in a multispecies biofilm assessed by quantitative in situ hybridization and scanning confocal laser microscopy.

Authors:  S Møller; A R Pedersen; L K Poulsen; E Arvin; S Molin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Regulation in the rpoS regulon of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  P C Loewen; B Hu; J Strutinsky; R Sparling
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Optical sectioning of microbial biofilms.

Authors:  J R Lawrence; D R Korber; B D Hoyle; J W Costerton; D E Caldwell
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Tobramycin resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells growing as a biofilm on urinary catheter material.

Authors:  J C Nickel; I Ruseska; J B Wright; J W Costerton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Induction of RpoS-dependent functions in glucose-limited continuous culture: what level of nutrient limitation induces the stationary phase of Escherichia coli?

Authors:  L Notley; T Ferenci
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  61 in total

Review 1.  Problems posed by natural environments for monitoring microorganisms.

Authors:  C Edwards
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Analysis of rpoS and bolA gene expression under various stress-induced environments in planktonic and biofilm phase using 2(-ΔΔCT) method.

Authors:  Mohd Adnan; Glyn Morton; Sibte Hadi
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 3.  The RpoS-mediated general stress response in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Aurelia Battesti; Nadim Majdalani; Susan Gottesman
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 15.500

4.  Role of sigmaD in regulating genes and signals during Myxococcus xanthus development.

Authors:  Poorna Viswanathan; Mitchell Singer; Lee Kroos
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Comparative analysis of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium biofilm formation on gallstones and on glass.

Authors:  A M Prouty; J S Gunn
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Effect of Escherichia coli morphogene bolA on biofilms.

Authors:  Helena L A Vieira; Patrick Freire; Cecília M Arraiano
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Roles of RpoS in Yersinia pseudotuberculosis stress survival, motility, biofilm formation and type VI secretion system expression.

Authors:  Jingyuan Guan; Xiao Xiao; Shengjuan Xu; Fen Gao; Jianbo Wang; Tietao Wang; Yunhong Song; Junfeng Pan; Xihui Shen; Yao Wang
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.422

8.  Biofilm formation-gene expression relay system in Escherichia coli: modulation of sigmaS-dependent gene expression by the CsgD regulatory protein via sigmaS protein stabilization.

Authors:  Luciana Gualdi; Letizia Tagliabue; Paolo Landini
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Impact of the RNA chaperone Hfq on the fitness and virulence potential of uropathogenic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Richard R Kulesus; Karen Diaz-Perez; E Susan Slechta; Danelle S Eto; Matthew A Mulvey
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 10.  Escherichia coli biofilms.

Authors:  C Beloin; A Roux; J M Ghigo
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.291

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.