OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential role of a store-and-forward (SAF) telemedicine system in specialty consultations initiated by primary care physicians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this pilot telemedicine study, patients needing consultations in cardiology, dermatology, endocrinology, and orthopedics had both standard face-to-face (FTF) consultations and SAF consultations. RESULTS: Fifteen patients had both FTF and SAF consultations, 4 had echocardiograms transmitted for an SAF consultation only, and 1 had an SAF consultation but no FTF appointment. Of 19 diagnoses made, all were essentially the same in both types of consultations; 14 of 15 FTF consultations and 15 of 19 SAF consultations resulted in additional treatment recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: While it was possible to develop a desktop system for SAF consultations, the equipment was not adequately integrated. Without total digital input, including electronic patient medical records, packaging of information is laborious and impractical. Seamlessly adapting to existing clinical practice is vital. Issues such as increasing work for the physicians or office staff, gathering adequate patient information, and designing a referral process were more difficult than we had anticipated. Patient acceptance was high, but the clinical pilot had very small numbers.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential role of a store-and-forward (SAF) telemedicine system in specialty consultations initiated by primary care physicians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this pilot telemedicine study, patients needing consultations in cardiology, dermatology, endocrinology, and orthopedics had both standard face-to-face (FTF) consultations and SAF consultations. RESULTS: Fifteen patients had both FTF and SAF consultations, 4 had echocardiograms transmitted for an SAF consultation only, and 1 had an SAF consultation but no FTF appointment. Of 19 diagnoses made, all were essentially the same in both types of consultations; 14 of 15 FTF consultations and 15 of 19 SAF consultations resulted in additional treatment recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: While it was possible to develop a desktop system for SAF consultations, the equipment was not adequately integrated. Without total digital input, including electronic patient medical records, packaging of information is laborious and impractical. Seamlessly adapting to existing clinical practice is vital. Issues such as increasing work for the physicians or office staff, gathering adequate patient information, and designing a referral process were more difficult than we had anticipated. Patient acceptance was high, but the clinical pilot had very small numbers.
Authors: Delphine S Tuot; Clare Liddy; Varsha G Vimalananda; Jennifer Pecina; Elizabeth J Murphy; Erin Keely; Steven R Simon; Frederick North; Jay D Orlander; Alice Hm Chen Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-10-24 Impact factor: 2.655