I Hickie1, A Koschera, D Hadzi-Pavlovic, B Bennett, A Lloyd. 1. School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Academic Department of Psychiatry, St George Hospital and Community Health Service, Kogarah, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Depression, anxiety and fatigue are among the most common symptoms presented in primary care. Whether such symptoms indicate discrete psychological syndromes or whether they result from a common vulnerability is not clear. This study examined longitudinally the patterns of co-morbidity between prolonged fatigue and other forms of psychological distress in patients attending general practitioners. METHODS: Adults attending primary care completed questionnaires designed to detect cases of prolonged fatigue and psychological distress at presentation and 12 months later. RESULTS: Of 652 patients, the prevalence rates of 'prolonged fatigue' alone, 'psychological distress' alone, 'prolonged fatigue + psychological distress' and 'no disorder' were 7%, 19%, 15% and 59% respectively at initial assessment. Of those patients with any prolonged fatigue syndrome initially, 58% still reported fatigue 12 months later (representing 13% of the total sample). Most importantly, the risk of developing prolonged fatigue was not increased in patients who initially had psychological distress (OR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.2-3.6), neither was the risk of developing psychological distress increased in patients who initially had prolonged fatigue (OR = 1.4; 95% CI 0.6-3.4). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that prolonged fatigue is a persistent diagnosis over time. The longitudinal patterns of co-morbidity with psychological distress do not support an aetiological model that proposes a common vulnerability factor for these disorders. Psychiatric classification systems may be better served by treating prolonged fatigue and psychological distress as independent disorders.
BACKGROUND:Depression, anxiety and fatigue are among the most common symptoms presented in primary care. Whether such symptoms indicate discrete psychological syndromes or whether they result from a common vulnerability is not clear. This study examined longitudinally the patterns of co-morbidity between prolonged fatigue and other forms of psychological distress in patients attending general practitioners. METHODS: Adults attending primary care completed questionnaires designed to detect cases of prolonged fatigue and psychological distress at presentation and 12 months later. RESULTS: Of 652 patients, the prevalence rates of 'prolonged fatigue' alone, 'psychological distress' alone, 'prolonged fatigue + psychological distress' and 'no disorder' were 7%, 19%, 15% and 59% respectively at initial assessment. Of those patients with any prolonged fatigue syndrome initially, 58% still reported fatigue 12 months later (representing 13% of the total sample). Most importantly, the risk of developing prolonged fatigue was not increased in patients who initially had psychological distress (OR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.2-3.6), neither was the risk of developing psychological distress increased in patients who initially had prolonged fatigue (OR = 1.4; 95% CI 0.6-3.4). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that prolonged fatigue is a persistent diagnosis over time. The longitudinal patterns of co-morbidity with psychological distress do not support an aetiological model that proposes a common vulnerability factor for these disorders. Psychiatric classification systems may be better served by treating prolonged fatigue and psychological distress as independent disorders.
Authors: Kate Webber; Kelly Mok; Barbara Bennett; Andrew R Lloyd; Michael Friedlander; Ilona Juraskova; David Goldstein Journal: Oncologist Date: 2011-08-11
Authors: Leonard A Jason; Karina Corradi; Susan Torres-Harding; Renee R Taylor; Caroline King Journal: Neuropsychol Rev Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 7.444
Authors: Ian Hickie; Tracey Davenport; Denis Wakefield; Ute Vollmer-Conna; Barbara Cameron; Suzanne D Vernon; William C Reeves; Andrew Lloyd Journal: BMJ Date: 2006-09-01
Authors: Karin Tritt; Marius Nickel; Ferdinand Mitterlehner; Cerstin Nickel; Petra Forthuber; Peter Leiberich; Wolfhardt Rother; Thomas Loew Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2004-03-31 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: I J Kant; U Bültmann; K A P Schröer; A J H M Beurskens; L G P M Van Amelsvoort; G M H Swaen Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: H Laubenthal; M Valet; T Sprenger; A Wöller; T R Tölle; H Röpcke; S Wirz; C Schröter; M Schiltenwolf; P Henningsen; T Sundermeier; H J Ebell; N Kohnen; W Häuser Journal: Schmerz Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 1.107