Literature DB >> 10472973

Assessment of internal auditory canal tumors: a comparison of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and steady-state T2-weighted gradient-echo MR imaging.

P Schmalbrock1, D W Chakeres, J W Monroe, A Saraswat, B A Miles, D B Welling.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Although contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging is the standard of reference for diagnosing tumor in the cerebellopontine angle, high-resolution T2-weighted imaging may show more details of the seventh and eighth cranial nerve branches, resulting in more accurate tumor volume measurements. The purpose of this study was to compare two MR sequences for their ability to delineate internal auditory canal tumors.
METHODS: Twenty-seven ears in 21 patients with 16 confirmed schwannomas were studied with the 3D T2-weighted prototype segment-interleaved motion-compensated acquisition in steady state (SIMCAST) and the T1-weighted contrast-enhanced spoiled gradient-echo (SPGR) techniques. Twenty-eight axial sections were acquired using parameters of 17/3.3 (TR/TE), a 40 degrees flip angle, a 20 x 15-cm or 22 x 16-cm field of view (FOV), a 512 x 256 matrix, and a 0.4- or 1.2-mm section thickness for the SIMCAST technique, and 30/4.2, a 30 degrees flip angle, a 20 x 20-cm FOV, a 512 x 288 matrix, and a 1.5-mm section thickness for the SPGR technique. Tumor appearance and depiction of surrounding anatomy, including the cranial nerves, were evaluated. Tumor volumes were measured by manual tracing.
RESULTS: Both sequences clearly identified tumors that ranged in size from 0.06 to 3.0 cm3. Measurements on both sequences agreed, on average, within 14%. The information from both sequences was complementary. SIMCAST usually delineated the CSF spaces better, whereas SPGR more clearly showed the tumor/brain boundary.
CONCLUSION: SIMCAST and SPGR are suitable for tumor detection and volume measurements. SPGR has somewhat better contrast, but SIMCAST excels at depicting the surrounding anatomy and tumor involvement of the seventh and eighth cranial nerves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10472973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  9 in total

1.  MR cisternography of the cerebellopontine angle: comparison of three-dimensional fast asymmetrical spin-echo and three-dimensional constructive interference in the steady-state sequences.

Authors:  S Naganawa; T Koshikawa; H Fukatsu; T Ishigaki; T Fukuta
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Screening for cerebellopontine angle tumors: is a CISS sufficient?

Authors:  Einar Goebell; Thorsten Ries; Thomas Kucinski; Ullrich Grzyska; Bernd Eckert; Jens Fiehler; Britta Eickhoff; Jan Regelsberger; Christoph Koch; Herrmann Zeumer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-12-31       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Long-term hearing preservation after microsurgical excision of vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  Erika Ann Woodson; Ryan Douglas Dempewolf; Samuel Paul Gubbels; Aaron Thomas Porter; Jacob Jay Oleson; Marlan Rex Hansen; Bruce Jay Gantz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of a non-contrast screening MRI protocol for vestibular schwannoma in patients with asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Matthew G Crowson; Daniel J Rocke; Jenny K Hoang; Jane L Weissman; David M Kaylie
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Cranial nerve assessment in posterior fossa tumors with fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA).

Authors:  Takeshi Mikami; Yoshihiro Minamida; Toshiaki Yamaki; Izumi Koyanagi; Tadashi Nonaka; Kiyohiro Houkin
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2005-06-03       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Flow ghost artifact in slice-encoding direction mimicking vestibular schwannoma in contrast-enhanced 3D spoiled gradient-echo sequence.

Authors:  Shinji Naganawa; Tokiko Koshikawa; Hiroshi Fukatsu; Takeo Ishigaki; Ikuo Aoki
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-05       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Comparing size evaluation methods for acoustic neuroma after stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Anneyuko I Saito; Christopher G Morris; Kana Ito; Futoshi Watanabe; Kumiko Karasawa; William M Mendenhall; Yutaka Naoi
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-08-27

8.  EANO guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  Roland Goldbrunner; Michael Weller; Jean Regis; Morten Lund-Johansen; Pantelis Stavrinou; David Reuss; D Gareth Evans; Florence Lefranc; Kita Sallabanda; Andrea Falini; Patrick Axon; Olivier Sterkers; Laura Fariselli; Wolfgang Wick; Joerg-Christian Tonn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  Comparison of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and 3D constructive interference in steady state images for predicting outcome after hearing-preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  M Kocaoglu; N Bulakbasi; T Ucoz; B Ustunsoz; Y Pabuscu; C Tayfun; I Somuncu
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2003-06-11       Impact factor: 2.804

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.