Literature DB >> 10472965

A new look at threshold estimation algorithms for automated static perimetry.

A J Vingrys1, M J Pianta.   

Abstract

Automated perimetry is often associated with lengthy test times when a staircase algorithm is applied. This arises because the fixed step sizes used during threshold estimation (e.g.,4/2 dB) yield reduced test efficiency, with test times being dependent on the relative positioning of the start and endpoints, as well as the step size. Neighborhood logic may speed up the process, although several presentations are still required for normal threshold values and many more presentations are required for abnormal values. We consider whether there is any justification for using a fixed step size during the threshold procedure. We show how empirical data can be applied, within a Bayesian framework, to reduce test time with little or no loss of accuracy. Finally, we demonstrate the effect that the starting probability density function can have on test efficiency by implementing an empirically determined and bimodal probability density function that provides fast outcomes.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10472965     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199908000-00028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of Three Parametric Models for Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression Rate Distributions.

Authors:  Andrew J Anderson
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.283

2.  A Comparison of Perimetric Results from a Tablet Perimeter and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Glaucoma Patients.

Authors:  Yu Xiang George Kong; Mingguang He; Jonathan G Crowston; Algis J Vingrys
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Validation of a Tablet as a Tangent Perimeter.

Authors:  Algis J Vingrys; Jessica K Healey; Sheryl Liew; Veera Saharinen; Michael Tran; William Wu; George Y X Kong
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Comparative quantification of focal and diffuse visual field loss by the SPARK Precision threshold algorithm and SITA.

Authors:  S K Foo; R P Cubbidge; R Heitmar
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  Comparing the usefulness of a new algorithm to measure visual field using the variational Bayes linear regression in glaucoma patients, in comparison to the Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm.

Authors:  Hiroshi Murata; Ryo Asaoka; Yuri Fujino; Masato Matsuura; Kazunori Hirasawa; Satoshi Shimada; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 5.908

6.  Towards Patient-Tailored Perimetry: Automated Perimetry Can Be Improved by Seeding Procedures With Patient-Specific Structural Information.

Authors:  Jonathan Denniss; Allison M McKendrick; Andrew Turpin
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Incorporating Spatial Models in Visual Field Test Procedures.

Authors:  Nikki J Rubinstein; Allison M McKendrick; Andrew Turpin
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Sequentially optimized reconstruction strategy: A meta-strategy for perimetry testing.

Authors:  Şerife Seda Kucur; Raphael Sznitman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Assessing the GOANNA Visual Field Algorithm Using Artificial Scotoma Generation on Human Observers.

Authors:  Luke X Chong; Andrew Turpin; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  An Open-source Static Threshold Perimetry Test Using Remote Eye-tracking (Eyecatcher): Description, Validation, and Preliminary Normative Data.

Authors:  Pete R Jones
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.