Literature DB >> 10472812

Commodifying the polyvalent good of health care.

M C Kaveny1.   

Abstract

This essay serves as an introduction to this issue of the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy on commodification and health care. The essay attempts to sharpen the articulation of generally expressed worries about the commodification of health care. It does so by defining commodification, analyzing three components of the good of health care, and attempting to assess how commodification might distort the shape of each of those components. Next, it explores how the good of health care might be distorted by the market-based principle of distributive justice, "to each according to ability to pay." Finally, it identifies two basic questions about the relationship of medicine and the market that merit further exploration. (1) How does the market-based language of "incentives" so pervasive in the world of managed care distort the complex patterns of virtue and vice that motivate actors in the health care arena? (2) If we recognize that we cannot eliminate the influence of money from the health care system, how can we insure that the good of health care remains, in Radin's terms, "incompletely commodified"?

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10472812     DOI: 10.1076/jmep.24.3.207.2528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  4 in total

1.  From boardroom to bedside: a comprehensive organizational healthcare ethics.

Authors:  B H Childs
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2000-09

2.  Freedom of conscience and health care in the United States of america: the conflict between public health and religious liberty in the patient protection and affordable care act.

Authors:  Peter West-Oram
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2013-09

Review 3.  Medical tourism: between entrepreneurship opportunities and bioethics boundaries: narrative review article.

Authors:  Daniel Badulescu; Alina Badulescu
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.429

4.  How the logics of the market, bureaucracy, professionalism and care are reconciled in practice: an empirical ethics approach.

Authors:  Florien M Kruse; Wieke M R Ligtenberg; Anke J M Oerlemans; Stef Groenewoud; Patrick P T Jeurissen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.