Literature DB >> 10472107

Minimum 5-year results of degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and instrumented posterior fusion.

K C Booth1, K H Bridwell, B A Eisenberg, C R Baldus, L G Lenke.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: An analysis of consecutive cases of degenerative spondylolisthesis treated by one of two surgeons at a university hospital.
OBJECTIVES: To assess at a minimum 5-year follow-up the complication rate, reoperation rate, radiographic results, and patient satisfaction with surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis by means of segmental posterior instrumented fusion with decompression. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No reports of minimum 5-year follow-up for surgical treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis were found in the literature.
METHODS: The potential study population consisted of 49 consecutive patients who had undergone no prior surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis (average age, 66.7 years; range, 52.2-78.7 years) with mean follow-up of 6.5 years (range, 5-10.75 years) who were treated with decompression, autogenous iliac crest bone grafting, intertransverse process fusion, and segmental (pedicle screw) instrumentation. Eight patients had died; the remaining 41 were included in the study sample. Thirty-six (88%) of the 41 patients returned an outcome questionnaire and had current radiographs.
RESULTS: There was one case of instrument failure (one broken screw with late fusion), and one superficial infection. There were no neurologic deficits, no pseudarthroses, no recurrent stenosis at the fused segment, and no progression of deformity at the fused level. Five patients had symptomatic adjacent level transition syndromes. There were seven additional currently asymptomatic radiographic transition syndromes. Segmental sagittal Cobb angles were maintained at the fused level (17.7 +/- 8-18.8 +/- 7 degrees). Eighty-three percent reported satisfaction with the procedure, 86% thought their back and leg pain was still significantly better than before surgery, and 77% would have the procedure again if needed. Poor satisfaction (n = 4) was associated with more than four medical comorbidities (P < 0.03). A significant number (12 of 49, 24%) of patients had died or were ill more than 5 years after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Radiographic transition syndromes were common. Major complications (2%), implant failures (2%), and symptomatic pseudarthroses (0%) were low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10472107     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199908150-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  33 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of posterior lumbar dynamic stabilization: an in vitro comparison between Universal Clamp and Wallis systems.

Authors:  Brice Ilharreborde; Miranda N Shaw; Lawrence J Berglund; Kristin D Zhao; Ralph E Gay; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Reversibility of nerve root sedimentation sign in lumbar spinal stenosis patients after decompression surgery.

Authors:  Christian Barz; Markus Melloh; Lukas P Staub; Sarah J Lord; Harry R Merk; Thomas Barz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Foraminal height measurement techniques.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Ralph J Mobbs; Prashanth J Rao
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-12

4.  A meta-analysis of artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Wu Yajun; Zhu Yue; Han Xiuxin; Cui Cui
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion compared with motion-preservation procedures: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aixing Pan; Yong Hai; Jincai Yang; Lijin Zhou; Xiaolong Chen; Hui Guo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Thoracic disc herniation of the adjacent segment with acutely progressing myelopathy.

Authors:  In-Soo Oh; Jun-Yeong Seo; Kee-Yong Ha; Yoon-Chung Kim
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2010-04-26

7.  Predictors of outcomes after posterior decompression and fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Marc-Antoine Rousseau; Jean-Yves Lazennec; Elisa C Bass; Gérard Saillant
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Does Wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion?

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Thomas Repantis; Spyros Zacharatos; Andreas Zafiropoulos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Additional decompression at adjacent segments leads to adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF.

Authors:  Masayuki Miyagi; Osamu Ikeda; Seiji Ohtori; Yoshikazu Tsuneizumi; Yukio Someya; Masataka Shibayama; Yasufumi Ogawa; Gen Inoue; Sumihisa Orita; Yawara Eguchi; Hiroto Kamoda; Gen Arai; Tetsuhiro Ishikawa; Yasuchika Aoki; Tomoaki Toyone; Toshio Ooi; Kazuhisa Takahashi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Adjacent segment degeneration and disease after lumbar fusion compared with motion-preserving procedures: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chunpeng Ren; Yueming Song; Limin Liu; Youdi Xue
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-04-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.