Literature DB >> 10472105

Complications in the surgical treatment of pediatric high-grade, isthmic dysplastic spondylolisthesis. A comparison of three surgical approaches.

R W Molinari1, K H Bridwell, L G Lenke, F F Ungacta, K D Riew.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: An analysis of consecutive pediatric patients treated surgically for high-grade spondylolisthesis by one of three surgical procedures with emphasis on complications and functional outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: Complications, radiographic results and patient-assessed function, pain, and satisfaction were assessed among three surgical procedures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The existing literature is in disagreement about whether it is better to fuse without instrumented reduction or to use instrumentation and reduce high-grade dysplastic spondylolisthesis.
METHODS: Thirty-two patients had 37 surgical procedures for Meyerding Grade 3 or 4 isthmic dysplastic spondylolisthesis. Eleven patients were treated with an in situ L4-sacrum posterior fusion without decompression (Group 1), 7 had posterior decompression with posterior instrumentation and posterior fusion (Group 2), and 19 patients had reduction and a circumferential fusion procedure (Group 3). All patients had new radiographs taken at time of follow-up (average, 3.1 years; range, 2 years-10 years, 1 month) and completed a functional outcome questionnaire.
RESULTS: The incidence of pseudarthrosis was 45% (5 of 11) in Group 1, 29% (2 of 7) in Group 2, and 0% (0 of 19) in Group 3. All seven who had pseudarthrosis had small L5 transverse process surface area (< 2 cm2; P = 0.004). Only one patient had a neurologic deficit (unilateral extensor hallucis longus weakness) at time of follow-up. There were no significant differences among the groups in function, pain, and satisfaction in patients in whom solid fusion was obtained, but the scores were highest in Group 3.
CONCLUSIONS: In situ fusion surgery in patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis with small L5 transverse processes (surface area, < 2 cm2) results in a high rate of pseudarthrosis. Circumferential procedures result in the highest rate of fusion and are effective in achieving fusion in those patients with established pseudarthrosis. The use of long (> 60 mm) iliac screws bilaterally (n = 21) in addition to bicortical sacral screws (four-point sacral-pelvis fixation) along with anterior column fusion reduces the risk of instrumentation failure in a decompression and reduction procedure. Outcomes of function, pain, and satisfaction are excellent in those in whom fusion is achieved. The risks in circumferential fusion-reduction procedures are acceptable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10472105     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199908150-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  35 in total

1.  One-stage posterior spinal shortening by L5 partial spondylectomy for spondyloptosis or L5-S1 high-grade spondylolisthesis management.

Authors:  Ibrahim Obeid; Féthi Laouissat; Anouar Bourghli; Louis Boissière; Jean-Marc Vital
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  A proposal for a surgical classification of pediatric lumbosacral spondylolisthesis based on current literature.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Surgical treatment of high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis in childhood, adolescent and young adult by the "double-plate" technique: a past experience.

Authors:  Raphaël Vialle; Sebastian Charosky; Jean-Paul Padovani; Pierre Rigault; Christophe Glorion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Clinical incidence of sacroiliac joint arthritis and pain after sacropelvic fixation for spinal deformity.

Authors:  Seiji Ohtori; Takeshi Sainoh; Masashi Takaso; Gen Inoue; Sumihisa Orita; Yawara Eguchi; Junichi Nakamura; Yasuchika Aoki; Tetsuhiro Ishikawa; Masayuki Miyagi; Gen Arai; Hiroto Kamoda; Miyako Suzuki; Gou Kubota; Yoshihiro Sakuma; Yasuhiro Oikawa; Masashi Yamazaki; Tomoaki Toyone; Kazuhisa Takahashi
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.759

5.  Surface electrodes are not sufficient to detect neurotonic discharges: observations in a porcine model and clinical review of deltoid electromyographic monitoring using multiple electrodes.

Authors:  Stanley A Skinner; Ensor E Transfeldt; Kay Savik
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Assessment of lumbosacral kyphosis in spondylolisthesis: a computer-assisted reliability study of six measurement techniques.

Authors:  Panagiotis Glavas; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Stefan Parent; Jacques A de Guise; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Single segment of posterior lumbar interbody fusion for adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: reduction or fusion in situ.

Authors:  Xiao-Feng Lian; Tie-Sheng Hou; Jian-Guang Xu; Bing-Fang Zeng; Jie Zhao; Xiao-Kang Liu; Er-Zhu Yang; Cheng Zhao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Criteria for surgical reduction in high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis based on quality of life measures.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; M Timothy Hresko; Abdulmajeed Alzakri; Stefan Parent; Dan J Sucato; Lawrence G Lenke; Michelle Marks; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  [Spondylolisthesis in the growing spine].

Authors:  F Geiger; A Wirries
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Return of motor evoked potentials after knee flexion in the setting of high-grade spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Justin Tilan; Lindsay M Andras; Mark D Krieger; David L Skaggs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.