Literature DB >> 10470755

Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing traditional versus reduced tidal volume ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients.

R G Brower1, C B Shanholtz, H E Fessler, D M Shade, P White, C M Wiener, J G Teeter, J M Dodd-o, Y Almog, S Piantadosi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and potential efficacy of a mechanical ventilation strategy designed to reduce stretch-induced lung injury in acute respiratory distress syndrome.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.
SETTING: Eight intensive care units in four teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: Fifty-two patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
INTERVENTIONS: Traditional tidal volume patients: tidal volume 10-12 mL/kg ideal body weight, reduced if inspiratory plateau pressure was > 55 cm H2O (7.3 kPa). Small tidal volume patients: tidal volume 5-8 mL/kg ideal body weight, to keep plateau pressure < 30 cm H2O (4.0 kPa).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean tidal volumes during the first 5 days in traditional and small tidal volume patients were 10.2 and 7.3 mL/kg, respectively (p < .001), with mean plateau pressure = 30.6 and 24.9 cm H2O (3.3 kPa), respectively (p < .001). There were no significant differences in requirements for positive end-expiratory pressure or FIO2, fluid intakes/outputs, requirements for vasopressors, sedatives, or neuromuscular blocking agents, percentage of patients that achieved unassisted breathing, ventilator days, or mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: The reduced tidal volume strategy used in this study was safe. Failure to observe beneficial effects of small tidal volume ventilation treatment in important clinical outcome variables may have occurred because a) the sample size was too small to discern small treatment effects; b) the differences in tidal volumes and plateau pressures were modest; or c) reduced tidal volume ventilation is not beneficial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10470755     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199908000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  93 in total

Review 1.  The pulmonary physician in critical care. 8: Ventilatory management of ALI/ARDS.

Authors:  J J Cordingley; B F Keogh
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Point: should positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with ARDS be set on oxygenation? Yes.

Authors:  Russell R Miller; Neil R MacIntyre; R Duncan Hite; Jonathon D Truwit; Roy G Brower; Alan H Morris
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Bench test evaluation of volume delivered by modern ICU ventilators during volume-controlled ventilation.

Authors:  Aissam Lyazidi; Arnaud W Thille; Guillaume Carteaux; Fabrice Galia; Laurent Brochard; Jean-Christophe M Richard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Ventilator-induced lung injury: from the bench to the bedside.

Authors:  Lorraine N Tremblay; Arthur S Slutsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Acute respiratory distress syndrome: a historical perspective.

Authors:  Gordon R Bernard
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 6.  Ventilatory strategies and adjunctive therapy in ARDS.

Authors:  Ajay R Desai; Akash Deep
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.967

7.  Arteriovenous CO2 removal improves survival compared to high frequency percussive and low tidal volume ventilation in a smoke/burn sheep acute respiratory distress syndrome model.

Authors:  Frank C Schmalstieg; Susan E Keeney; Helen E Rudloff; Kimberly H Palkowetz; Manuel Cevallos; Xiaoquin Zhou; Robert A Cox; Hal K Hawkins; Daniel L Traber; Joseph B Zwischenberger
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Ventilatory strategies in patients with sepsis and respiratory failure.

Authors:  Dean R Hess; B Taylor Thompson
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.725

9.  Preoperative and intraoperative predictors of postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome in a general surgical population.

Authors:  James M Blum; Michael J Stentz; Ronald Dechert; Elizabeth Jewell; Milo Engoren; Andrew L Rosenberg; Pauline K Park
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 10.  Lung protective ventilation strategy for the acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Nicola Petrucci; Carlo De Feo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.