Literature DB >> 10470474

Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery following coronary angioplasty and stenting: results of a French multicenter registry.

C Loubeyre1, M C Morice, B Berzin, P Virot, P Commeau, G Drobinski, G Ethevenot, B Moquet, J Marco, P Labrunie, S Cattan, P Coste, P Aubry, A Ferrier.   

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of coronary stenting on the risk of emergency bypass surgery performed within 24 hr of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with particular concern for incidence and indication. Since 1995, coronary stenting has been increasingly performed in France during angioplasty procedures, altering significantly the role of emergency bypass surgery. The outcome of elective stenting and widespread use of coronary stenting and its influence on emergency surgery have not been evaluated so far. Through a retrospective (1995) and prospective (1996) registry, we analyzed the incidence, indication and results of emergency bypass surgery performed within 24 hr of PTCA in 68 and 57 centers, respectively, accounting for nearly half of all angioplasty procedures in France. Data were collected through questionnaires consisting of separate forms for every case report that were sent to every center. Over the two years, 26,885 and 27,497 procedures were investigated with a stenting rate of 46% and 64%, respectively. The observed need for emergency surgery was constantly low throughout this period (0.38% and 0.32%, respectively). Indications for surgery included complications directly due to stent in 37% of cases in the 2-year period. Outcome remained poor, with in-hospital mortality in 10% and 17% and myocardial infarction in 27% and 25% of cases, respectively. A comparison of the results in centers with and without surgical facilities showed no differences in outcome, despite a longer time to surgery (359 min +/- 406 min vs. 170 min +/- 205 min, P = 0.0001) and a lower incidence of emergency surgery (0.25% vs. 0.44%, P = 0.0001) in centers without on-site surgery backup. The French multicenter registry reveals an increase in the use of stents together with a dramatic decrease in the incidence of emergency bypass surgery (below 0.5%) following PTCA. There has been a significant evolution in the indication, and stent implantation now accounts for a third of the indications for emergency bypass surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10470474     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(199908)47:4<441::AID-CCD12>3.0.CO;2-S

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  4 in total

1.  Early and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery Following Iatrogenic Injuries During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Alexander Verevkin; Konstantin von Aspern; Sergey Leontyev; Sven Lehmann; Michael A Borger; Piroze M Davierwala
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 5.501

2.  Hybrid coronary revascularization as a safe, feasible, and viable alternative to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: what is the current evidence?

Authors:  Arjan J F P Verhaegh; Ryan E Accord; Leen van Garsse; Jos G Maessen
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2013-04-03

Review 3.  Risks and complications of coronary angiography: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Morteza Tavakol; Salman Ashraf; Sorin J Brener
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2012-01-01

4.  The mobile angiograph in a center without on-site surgical back-up: the de facto standard?

Authors:  Walid Hassan; Suleiman Kharabsheh
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.526

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.