OBJECTIVE: 1. To present the steps taken and lessons learned from one cancer centre's efforts to capture tumour stage information in a cancer database. 2. To determine the accuracy of the stage data through a chart audit. 3. To describe the potential uses of stage information in a cancer centre. DESIGN AND SETTING: This is a retrospective review of an initiative to capture tumour stage information at a regional cancer centre in Ontario. DATA SOURCES: The minutes of the centre's Health Records and Medical Advisory Committees related to staging were reviewed. Data on stage by tumour type was extracted from the centre's Oncology Patient Information System (OPIS). Three hundred and ninety charts were analysed to assess the accuracy of stage information and identify staging errors. Health Information Services workload statistics were reviewed to determine the types and frequency of projects undertaken using stage-related data. RESULTS: In January 1994, the Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre introduced policies and procedures to capture stage-related information. Standardized staging forms and a physician reminder system encouraged the centre's physicians to record tumour stage within 3 months of new patient registration. Of all qualifying cases in 1994, 92% were staged. A medical audit in 1998 of 390 charts from the 3 previous years of staging data revealed that 71.5% of the charts reviewed had been staged completely. Of the incompletely staged cases, 19% to 57% had TNM recorded, but the stage grouping was not recorded, or the "stage" was the extent of disease at the time of disease progression rather than at initial diagnosis (35% to 71%). Physician-related staging errors occurred in 2% to 5% of cases; data-entry errors occurred in 3% to 6% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Stage information has enabled the centre to better describe its patient clientele for accreditation purposes and to assist researchers in estimating the number of patients potentially available for prospective and retrospective studies. It is being used to guide targeted educational initiatives to selected populations in the region's catchment area and assists administrators in estimating resource needs. Resistance to the capture of stage information can be overcome with persistence, the development of procedures that facilitate physician compliance, including a reminder system, the development of institutional policies and procedures and by feedback on the uses and availability of stage information.
OBJECTIVE: 1. To present the steps taken and lessons learned from one cancer centre's efforts to capture tumour stage information in a cancer database. 2. To determine the accuracy of the stage data through a chart audit. 3. To describe the potential uses of stage information in a cancer centre. DESIGN AND SETTING: This is a retrospective review of an initiative to capture tumour stage information at a regional cancer centre in Ontario. DATA SOURCES: The minutes of the centre's Health Records and Medical Advisory Committees related to staging were reviewed. Data on stage by tumour type was extracted from the centre's Oncology Patient Information System (OPIS). Three hundred and ninety charts were analysed to assess the accuracy of stage information and identify staging errors. Health Information Services workload statistics were reviewed to determine the types and frequency of projects undertaken using stage-related data. RESULTS: In January 1994, the Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre introduced policies and procedures to capture stage-related information. Standardized staging forms and a physician reminder system encouraged the centre's physicians to record tumour stage within 3 months of new patient registration. Of all qualifying cases in 1994, 92% were staged. A medical audit in 1998 of 390 charts from the 3 previous years of staging data revealed that 71.5% of the charts reviewed had been staged completely. Of the incompletely staged cases, 19% to 57% had TNM recorded, but the stage grouping was not recorded, or the "stage" was the extent of disease at the time of disease progression rather than at initial diagnosis (35% to 71%). Physician-related staging errors occurred in 2% to 5% of cases; data-entry errors occurred in 3% to 6% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Stage information has enabled the centre to better describe its patient clientele for accreditation purposes and to assist researchers in estimating the number of patients potentially available for prospective and retrospective studies. It is being used to guide targeted educational initiatives to selected populations in the region's catchment area and assists administrators in estimating resource needs. Resistance to the capture of stage information can be overcome with persistence, the development of procedures that facilitate physician compliance, including a reminder system, the development of institutional policies and procedures and by feedback on the uses and availability of stage information.
Authors: Iain A McCowan; Darren C Moore; Anthony N Nguyen; Rayleen V Bowman; Belinda E Clarke; Edwina E Duhig; Mary-Jane Fry Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2007-08-21 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Yvonne N Flores; Pamela L Davidson; Terry T Nakazono; Daisy C Carreon; Cynthia M Mojica; Roshan Bastani Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 3.295