Literature DB >> 10469332

The time-course of psoralen ultraviolet A (PUVA) erythema.

S H Ibbotson1, P M Farr.   

Abstract

The time-course for the development of ultraviolet A-induced erythema in psoralen-sensitized skin differs from that caused by ultraviolet B or ultraviolet A but objective data are not available. During psoralen ultraviolet A therapy, the minimal phototoxic dose is determined 72 h after exposure, when psoralen ultraviolet A erythema is assumed to be maximal. This measurement is of fundamental importance in optimizing the therapeutic regimen. We examined a detailed time-course for development of psoralen ultraviolet A erythema in 16 subjects. The erythemal responses to ultraviolet B, ultraviolet A and psoralen ultraviolet A were assessed visually and using a reflectance device. Ultraviolet B erythema was maximal 24 h after exposure compared with subsequent time-points. Psoralen ultraviolet A erythema was evident at 24 h, with reduction in the median ultraviolet A minimal erythema dose from 14 to 5 J per cm2 in the presence of psoralen (p < 0.01; n = 9). Peak psoralen ultraviolet A erythema, assessed by minimal phototoxic dose, did not occur until 96 h or later in 75% of subjects. Using individual dose- response curves, we determined that only 67% of mean maximum psoralen ultraviolet A erythemal intensity had developed by 72 h. Furthermore, at the time of maximal erythema, the slope of the psoralen ultraviolet A dose-response curve was approximately 2-fold shallower than that for ultraviolet B-induced erythema. If assessment of psoralen ultraviolet A erythemal sensitivity had been made at 96 h instead of the conventional 72 h time-point, peak erythemal responses would not have been missed in any of the subjects. Based on these findings, it seems appropriate to consider whether psoralen ultraviolet A minimal phototoxic dose measurements should be performed 96 h after exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10469332     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00700.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invest Dermatol        ISSN: 0022-202X            Impact factor:   8.551


  3 in total

Review 1.  [New aspects in uv and photochemotherapy].

Authors:  M Grundmann-Kollman; A Tanew
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Potential of herbs in skin protection from ultraviolet radiation.

Authors:  Radava R Korać; Kapil M Khambholja
Journal:  Pharmacogn Rev       Date:  2011-07

3.  A Perspective on the Use of NB-UVB Phototherapy vs. PUVA Photochemotherapy.

Authors:  Sally H Ibbotson
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-07-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.