Literature DB >> 10468718

Electrokinetic lithotripsy: safety, efficacy and limitations of a new form of ballistic lithotripsy.

F X Keeley1, M Pillai, G Smith, M Chrisofos, D A Tolley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of electrokinetic lithotripsy (EKL), a ballistic lithotripter which uses high-energy magnetic fields to propel an impactor to fragment calculi. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records and radiographs of 121 patients who underwent ureteroscopy using the EKL for stones in the upper (26), mid (28) or lower (67) ureter were reviewed retrospectively. Ureteroscopy was performed with an 8.5 F semi-rigid ureteroscope, through which a 3 F EKL probe was passed.
RESULTS: A total of 148 stones (mean stone size 11.5 mm, range 6-40) in 121 patients were treated using the EKL. One patient was lost to follow-up. Of 148 stones, 147 (99.3%) were fragmented, including five that had resisted fragmentation with either pulsed-dye laser or electrohydraulic lithotripsy. Despite this, only 45 of 56 patients (80%) with a single stone in the lower ureter were rendered stone-free after a single ureteroscopic procedure. Seven patients in this group (12%) required shock-wave lithotripsy for fragments that had been propelled into the kidney, while four patients (7%) required repeat ureteroscopy for retained ureteric fragments. Complications were limited to minor ureteric perforations in two patients, both of which were treated with a stent.
CONCLUSION: EKL is an inexpensive and reliable endoscopic method which fragments nearly all urinary calculi. Its limitations include the propulsion of fragments and the need to use an offset, semi-rigid ureteroscope. We recommend the use of a basket or graspers to remove fragments of >/=4 mm after EKL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10468718     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00160.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  3 in total

Review 1.  Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts?

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-05-29

2.  Is routine ureteral stenting necessary after uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy for lower ureteral stones larger than 1 cm?

Authors:  Kenan Isen; Isen Kenan; Salih Bogatekin; Bogatekin Salih; Suat Em; Em Suat; Huseyin Ergin; Ergin Huseyin; Vehbi Kilic; Kilic Vehbi
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2008-04-02

Review 3.  Salivary lithotripsy in the era of sialendoscopy.

Authors:  P Capaccio; S Torretta; L Pignataro; M Koch
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.124

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.