Literature DB >> 10468521

Influence of balloon pressure during stent placement in native coronary arteries on early and late angiographic and clinical outcome: A randomized evaluation of high-pressure inflation.

J Dirschinger1, A Kastrati, F J Neumann, P Boekstegers, S Elezi, J Mehilli, H Schühlen, J Pache, E Alt, R Blasini, G Steinbeck, A Schömig.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-pressure dilatation is considered a better stent placement strategy, but this has not yet been proved by appropriately designed studies. The objective of this randomized trial was to assess the role of high-pressure dilatation in the early and late outcome of patients undergoing coronary stent placement. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Consecutive patients with coronary stent placement were randomly assigned to high- (15 to 20 atm, 468 patients) or low- (8 to 13 atm, 466 patients) balloon-pressure dilatation. The primary end point of the study was the event-free survival at 1 year. Secondary end points were the incidence of stent thrombosis at 30 days and angiographic restenosis (>/=50% diameter stenosis) at 6 months. The incidence of stent thrombosis was 1.7% in the high-pressure and 1.9% in the low-pressure group (relative risk 0.89; 95% CI 0.30 to 2.56). During the first 30 days, although there was no significant difference in the incidence of Q-wave myocardial infarction, the incidence of non-Q-wave infarction was 6.4% in the high-pressure and 3.4% in the low-pressure group (relative risk 1. 87; 95% CI 1.02 to 3.42). The restenosis rate was 30.4% in the high-pressure and 31.4% in the low-pressure group (relative risk 0. 97; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.26). Event-free survival at 1 year was not significantly different between the groups, with 78.8% in high-pressure patients and 75.5% in patients assigned to low-pressure dilatation (hazard ratio 0.85; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.11).
CONCLUSIONS: The systematic use of high-balloon-pressure inflation (15 to 20 atm) during coronary stent placement is not associated with any significant influence on the 1-year outcome of patients undergoing this intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10468521     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.100.9.918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  12 in total

Review 1.  Stent thrombosis: historical perspectives and current trends.

Authors:  D E Cutlip
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  A finite element study on variations in mass transport in stented porcine coronary arteries based on location in the coronary arterial tree.

Authors:  Joseph T Keyes; Bruce R Simon; Jonathan P Vande Geest
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Hyperexpansion of coronary stents and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Alexandre Schaan de Quadros; Rogério Sarmento-Leite; Carlos A M Gottschall; Guilherme V Silva; Emerson C Perin
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2006

4.  Coronary stent symmetry and vascular injury determine experimental restenosis.

Authors:  C Schulz; R A Herrmann; C Beilharz; J Pasquantonio; E Alt
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Prospective randomized trial comparing a nitinol self-expanding coronary stent with low-pressure dilatation and a high-pressure balloon expandable bare metal stent.

Authors:  Shinichiro Tanaka; Sachiro Watanabe; Hitoshi Matsuo; Tomonori Segawa; Makoto Iwama; Takeshi Hirose; Haruki Takahashi; Koji Ono; Shunichiro Warita; Tai Kojima; Shinya Minatoguchi; Hisayoshi Fujiwara
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Effect of stent inflation pressure and post-dilatation on the outcome of coronary artery intervention. A report of more than 90,000 stent implantations.

Authors:  Ole Fröbert; Giovanna Sarno; Stefan K James; Nawsad Saleh; Bo Lagerqvist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Long-term outcome after coronary stenting.

Authors:  Adnan Kastrati; Donald Hall; Albert Schömig
Journal:  Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2000

8.  Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate stent implantation in patients with calcific coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Ingibjorg Gudmundsdottir; Philip Adamson; Calum Gray; James C Spratt; Miles W Behan; Peter Henriksen; David E Newby; Nicholas Mills; Neal G Uren; Nicholas L Cruden
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2015-12-22

9.  A Comparison of Peri-Procedural Myocardial Infarction between Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon and Drug-Eluting Stent on De Novo Coronary Lesions.

Authors:  Ae Young Her; Kyoung Im Cho; Gillian Balbir Singh; Scot Garg; Yong Hoon Kim; Bon Kwon Koo; Eun Seok Shin
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Soft Miniaturized Actuation and Sensing Units for Dynamic Force Control of Cardiac Ablation Catheters.

Authors:  Nitish Kumar; Jackson Wirekoh; Samir Saba; Cameron N Riviere; Yong-Lae Park
Journal:  Soft Robot       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 8.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.