Literature DB >> 10467577

Learning "what" and "how" in a human motor task.

V Brooks1, F Hilperath, M Brooks, H G Ross, H J Freund.   

Abstract

We studied the development of implicit and of verbally declared knowledge for normal human subjects who learned an unfamiliar motor task in one learning session. The exploratory nature of motor learning and a special period for optimizing skill were followed in real time. Subjects understood the goal for task success, but they had to learn a motor strategy of what pattern of serial movements to make and the tactics of how much to scale their amplitudes and timing. We compared the time course for acquiring tactical skill with that for acquiring knowledge of strategy and of tactics, and their necessary cues. Implicit and declarative knowledge were distinguished from one another by correlating subjects' verbal self-reports with movement kinematics and their results. Implicit generation of the correct strategy and of the tactics developed in an exploratory manner from the beginning of the learning session. Implicit strategy learning soon gave way to conscious efforts, but tactical learning remained implicit until its first unambiguous verbal declaration (with one exception). First strategy declarations were voiced before those for tactics, during trial-and-error learning that did not require task success, and referred to reversing the direction of hand movements (one exception). In contrast, first declarations of tactics almost always required actual or imminent success, referred to when direction was to be reversed, and it was achieved near the top of a sigmoid learning curve that rose to tactical skill (with one exception). During the sigmoid rise, movement amplitudes and timing were optimized in a distinct manner, although tactics usually adapted thereafter to movements of more moderate speed that could still be successful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 10467577     DOI: 10.1101/lm.2.5.225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  7 in total

Review 1.  Principles of sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Jörn Diedrichsen; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Acquiring and adapting a novel audiomotor map in human grasping.

Authors:  Daniel Säfström; Benoni B Edin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Adapting to inversion of the visual field: a new twist on an old problem.

Authors:  Timothy P Lillicrap; Pablo Moreno-Briseño; Rosalinda Diaz; Douglas B Tweed; Nikolaus F Troje; Juan Fernandez-Ruiz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Temporal and kinematic consistency predict sequence awareness.

Authors:  Molly J Jaynes; Marc H Schieber; Jonathan W Mink
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Feasibility of the adaptive and automatic presentation of tasks (ADAPT) system for rehabilitation of upper extremity function post-stroke.

Authors:  Younggeun Choi; James Gordon; Hyeshin Park; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Effects of forced movements on learning: Findings from a choice reaction time task in rats.

Authors:  Hidekazu Kaneko; Hiroto Sano; Yasuhisa Hasegawa; Hiroshi Tamura; Shinya S Suzuki
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Assessing the functions underlying learning using by-trial and by-participant models: Evidence from two visual perceptual learning paradigms.

Authors:  Aaron Cochrane; C Shawn Green
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.