Literature DB >> 10467386

Measuring evoked responses in multiple sclerosis.

G Comi1, L Leocani, S Medaglini, T Locatelli, V Martinelli, G Santuccio, P Rossi.   

Abstract

Evoked potentials (EPs) have been widely utilised in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients to demonstrate the involvement of sensory and motor pathways. Their diagnostic value is based on the ability to reveal clinically silent lesions and to objectivate the central nervous system damage in patients who complain frequently of vague and indefinite disturbances which frequently occurs in the early phases of the disease. The advent of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques has greatly reduced the clinical utilisation of EPs, which is not fully justifiable, as the information provided by EPs are quite different from those provided by MRI. The abnormalities of evoked responses reflect the global damage of the evoked nervous pathway and are significantly correlated with the clinical findings, while the vast majority of MRI lesions are not associated to symptoms and signs. Transversal and longitudinal studies have demonstrated that EP changes in MS are more strictly related to disability than MRI lesion burden. On the contrary, MRI is more sensitive than EPs in revealing the disease activity. Evoked responses modifications observed in MS are not disease-specific; moreover longitudinal studies showed latency and morphology changes of evoked responses not always related to clinical changes. Such a dissociation can be explained both by technical factors and by subclinical disease activity. To reduce the negative impact of technical aspects, only reproducible parameters of the evoked responses should be used to monitor disease evolution and therapeutic interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10467386     DOI: 10.1177/135245859900500412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mult Scler        ISSN: 1352-4585            Impact factor:   6.312


  7 in total

Review 1.  Neurophysiological markers.

Authors:  Letizia Leocani; Giancarlo Comi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials, clinical evaluation, and imaging findings in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Hayat Güven; Omer Bayır; Emrah Aytaç; Ali Ozdek; Selim Selçuk Comoğlu; Hakan Korkmaz
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Clinical, Radiological and Electrophysiological Comparison of Immunomodulatory Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Gençer Genç; Şeref Demirkaya; Semai Bek; Zeki Odabaşi
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 1.339

4.  Clinical correlations of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in neuromyelitis optica.

Authors:  Wei-Chia Tsao; Rong-Kuo Lyu; Long-Sun Ro; Ming-Fen Lao; Chiung-Mei Chen; Yih-Ru Wu; Chin-Chang Huang; Hong-Shiu Chang; Hung-Chao Kuo; Chun-Che Chu; Kuo-Hsuan Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Multimodal evoked potentials for functional quantification and prognosis in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Xavier Giffroy; Nathalie Maes; Adelin Albert; Pierre Maquet; Jean-Michel Crielaard; Dominique Dive
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 6.  A new role for evoked potentials in MS? Repurposing evoked potentials as biomarkers for clinical trials in MS.

Authors:  Martin Hardmeier; Letizia Leocani; Peter Fuhr
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 6.312

7.  Improved characterization of visual evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis by topographic analysis.

Authors:  Martin Hardmeier; Florian Hatz; Yvonne Naegelin; Darren Hight; Christian Schindler; Ludwig Kappos; Margitta Seeck; Christoph M Michel; Peter Fuhr
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.020

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.