Literature DB >> 10466606

Outcome analysis for gastroschisis.

C L Snyder1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: Several factors are reportedly associated with an adverse outcome in gastroschisis, including mode of delivery, in utero diagnosis, type of closure, concurrent anomalies, intestinal atresia, and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Since 1969, the authors have treated 185 patients who had gastroschisis. The authors analyzed their database to identify variables associated with increased morbidity and mortality.
METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients with gastroschisis treated at our institution in the last 30 years was performed. The characteristics of survivors and nonsurvivors were compared. A logistic regression analysis was performed, with survival as the dependent variable, and the following parameters as independent variables: in utero diagnosis, mode of delivery, gestational age and birth weight, era of repair, type of closure, presence of other associated anomalies, intestinal atresia, and development of necrotizing enterocolitis. Further logistic regression analysis was performed, with various indicators of morbidity as dependent variables. These included development of sepsis, bowel obstruction, and complications related to the closure or to the silo. No attempt at long-term follow-up was made.
RESULTS: A total of 185 infants with gastroschisis were treated at our institution from 1969 to 1999. Mean gestational age was 36.6 weeks, and the mean birth weight was 2,501 g. A total of 21 infants had intestinal atresia. NEC developed in 8 infants. Six infants had other serious anomalies. The overall survival rate was 91%. Survival improved in last 2 decades (94%). There were no differences in gestational age, birth weight and mode of delivery, method of closure, or presence of intestinal atresia between survivors and nonsurvivors. Only the era of repair (P = .002), presence of necrotizing enterocolitis (P = .044), and presence of other major anomalies (P < .001) correlated with mortality in the logistic regression analysis. Sepsis, bowel obstruction, and closure complications accounted for most of the morbidity. Analysis of these three morbidity factors identified low gestational age (P = .038) and development of necrotizing enterocolitis (P = .020) as independent predictors of sepsis. Closure complications were only associated with lower birth weight (P = .006). No predictors of bowel obstruction were identified.
CONCLUSIONS: Mode of delivery, method of closure, birth weight and gestational age, and the presence of intestinal atresia do not appear to correlate with survival in infants with gastroschisis. Only the presence of another major anomaly, the era of repair, and the development of necrotizing enterocolitis were associated with increased mortality. Degree of prematurity and development of enterocolitis were associated with an increased incidence of septic complications. Low birth weight was a marker for closure complications. Type of delivery (vaginal or cesarean section) had no influence on either morbidity or mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10466606     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(99)90162-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  16 in total

1.  The outcome of newborns with abdominal wall defects according to the method of abdominal closure: the experience of a single center.

Authors:  João Gilberto Maksoud-Filho; Uenis Tannuri; Marcos Marques da Silva; João Gilberto Maksoud
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Gastroschisis closure: a technique for improved cosmetic repair.

Authors:  Christoph Heinrich Houben; Shailesh Patel
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 3.  Teratogens inducing congenital abdominal wall defects in animal models.

Authors:  Dennis R Van Dorp; John M Malleis; Brian P Sullivan; Michael D Klein
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 4.  A clinical-pathogenetic approach on associated anomalies and chromosomal defects supports novel candidate critical regions and genes for gastroschisis.

Authors:  Victor M Salinas-Torres; Rafael A Salinas-Torres; Ricardo M Cerda-Flores; Hugo L Gallardo-Blanco; Laura E Martínez-de-Villarreal
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Arterial hypertension after surgical closure of omphalocele and gastroschisis.

Authors:  François Cachat; Guy Van Melle; Eugene D McGahren; Olivier Reinberg; Victoria Norwood
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 3.714

6.  Factors determining outcome in gastroschisis: clinical experience over 18 years.

Authors:  L Cara Jager; Hugo A Heij
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Gastroschisis: preterm or term delivery?

Authors:  Henrique Soares; Ana Silva; Gustavo Rocha; Susana Pissarra; Jorge Correia-Pinto; Hercília Guimarães
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Outcomes in neonates with gastroschisis in U.S. children's hospitals.

Authors:  Oliver B Lao; Cindy Larison; Michelle M Garrison; John H T Waldhausen; Adam B Goldin
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Neonatal haemochromatosis associated with gastroschisis.

Authors:  M P Thornton; S S Marven; M S Tanner; B Gürtl-Lackner
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 1.827

10.  Predictive factors at birth of the severity of gastroschisis.

Authors:  Anthony S de Buys Roessingh; Amélie Damphousse; Pierluigi Ballabeni; Josée Dubois; Sarah Bouchard
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2015-11-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.