Literature DB >> 10466364

The influence of continuous sliding and subsequent surface wear on the friction of articular cartilage.

H Forster1, J Fisher.   

Abstract

Reciprocating motion friction tests were conducted upon cartilage-on-metal contacts while subjected to a constant load. Initial friction coefficients were compared with repeat friction coefficients following a sufficient load removal period. The repeat friction coefficients were marginally higher than the initial values and both were primarily dependent on the loading time. It was concluded that while a wear component had been identified, which modestly increased friction coefficients, the overriding parameter influencing friction was loading time. The authors postulate that fluid phase load carriage (being dependent on loading time) within the articular cartilage is largely responsible for low friction coefficients in the mixed and boundary lubrication regimes. This mechanism has been referred to as biphasic lubrication. Both synovial fluid and Ringer's solution were used as lubricants. Over the assessed 120 min loading time friction coefficients rose from 0.005 (for both lubricants) after 5 s to 0.50 and 0.57 for synovial fluid and Ringer's solution respectively. Synovial fluid was found to significantly reduce friction coefficients compared to Ringer's solution over broad ranges of the assessed loading times (p < 0.05). Stylus and non-contacting laser profilometry were successfully employed to provide reliable, quantitative and accurate measures of surface roughness. Laser profilometry before and after a continuous sliding friction test revealed a significant increase in surface roughness from Ra = 0.8 (+/- 0.2) micron to Ra = 2.1 (+/- 0.2) microns, (p < 0.0005); confirming that surface wear was occurring. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed the typical highly orientated collagen fibres of the superficial tangential zone. Environmental SEM (ESEM) of fully hydrated cartilage specimens provided largely featureless images of the surface which suggested that sample preparation for conventional SEM was detrimental to the authenticity of the cartilage surface appearance using SEM. Two distinct acellular, non-collagenous surface layers were identified using ESEM and transmission electron microscopy (TEM); respectively referred to as the boundary layer and surface lamina. The phospholipid/glycoprotein based boundary layer will provide boundary lubrication during intimate contact of opposing cartilage surfaces. The surface lamina, being a continuum of the proteoglycan interfibrillar matrix, is present to prevent fibrillation of the underlying collagen fibres. Both layers may contribute to the time dependent frictional response of articular cartilage. Although laser profilometry did reveal surface wear which was consistent with a small increase in friction, the primary variable controlling the friction coefficient was the period of loading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10466364     DOI: 10.1243/0954411991535167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  54 in total

1.  Frictional properties of the meniscus improve after scaffold-augmented repair of partial meniscectomy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Natalie K Galley; Jason P Gleghorn; Scott Rodeo; Russell F Warren; Suzanne A Maher; Lawrence J Bonassar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Investigation of contact characteristics and frictional properties of natural articular cartilage at two different surface configurations.

Authors:  Shanhua Qian; Liyong Zhang; Zi Feng Ni; Chuanhui Huang; Dekun Zhang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  Patellofemoral joint biomechanics and tissue engineering.

Authors:  Gerard A Ateshian; Clark T Hung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Comparison of patellar resurfacing versus preservation in high flexion total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Seong Hwan Kim; Sahnghoon Lee; Du Hyun Ro; Yool Cho; Young Min Lee; Kee Yun Chung; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Wear and damage of articular cartilage with friction against orthopedic implant materials.

Authors:  Sevan R Oungoulian; Krista M Durney; Brian K Jones; Christopher S Ahmad; Clark T Hung; Gerard A Ateshian
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Microscale frictional response of bovine articular cartilage from atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Seonghun Park; Kevin D Costa; Gerard A Ateshian
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Frictional response of bovine articular cartilage under creep loading following proteoglycan digestion with chondroitinase ABC.

Authors:  Ines M Basalo; Faye Hui Chen; Clark T Hung; Gerard A Ateshian
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Articular cartilage wear characterization with a particle sizing and counting analyzer.

Authors:  Sevan R Oungoulian; Stephany Chang; Orian Bortz; Kristin E Hehir; Kaicen Zhu; Callen E Willis; Clark T Hung; Gerard A Ateshian
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Analysis of friction between articular cartilage and polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel artificial cartilage.

Authors:  Feng Li; Anmin Wang; Chengtao Wang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Scaffold-free cartilage subjected to frictional shear stress demonstrates damage by cracking and surface peeling.

Authors:  G Adam Whitney; Karthik Jayaraman; James E Dennis; Joseph M Mansour
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.