Literature DB >> 10464012

New 4-point pharmacophore method for molecular similarity and diversity applications: overview of the method and applications, including a novel approach to the design of combinatorial libraries containing privileged substructures.

J S Mason1, I Morize, P R Menard, D L Cheney, C Hulme, R F Labaudiniere.   

Abstract

A new 4-point pharmacophore method for molecular similarity and diversity that rapidly calculates all potential pharmacophores/pharmacophoric shapes for a molecule or a protein site is described. The method, an extension to the ChemDiverse/Chem-X software (Oxford Molecular, Oxford, England), has also been customized to enable a new internally referenced measure of pharmacophore diversity. The "privileged" substructure concept for the design of high-affinity ligands is presented, and an example of this new method is described for the design of combinatorial libraries for 7-transmembrane G-protein-coupled receptor targets, where "privileged" substructures are used as special features to internally reference the pharmacophoric shapes. Up to 7 features and 15 distance ranges are considered, giving up to 350 million potential 4-point 3D pharmacophores/molecule. The resultant pharmacophore "key" ("fingerprint") serves as a powerful measure for diversity or similarity, calculable for both a ligand and a protein site, and provides a consistent frame of reference for comparing molecules, sets of molecules, and protein sites. Explicit "on-the-fly" conformational sampling is performed for a molecule to enable the calculation of all geometries accessible for all combinations of four features (i.e., 4-point pharmacophores) at any desired sampling resolution. For a protein site, complementary site points to groups displayed in the site are generated and all combinations of four site points are considered. In this paper we report (i) the details of our customized implementation of the method and its modification to systematically measure 4-point pharmacophores relative to a "special" substructure of interest present in the molecules under study; (ii) comparisons of 3- and 4-point pharmacophore methods, highlighting the much increased resolution of the 4-point method; (iii) applications of the 4-point potential pharmacophore descriptors as a new measure of molecular similarity and diversity and for the design of focused/biased combinatorial libraries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10464012     DOI: 10.1021/jm9806998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Chem        ISSN: 0022-2623            Impact factor:   7.446


  34 in total

1.  Combinatorial chemistry and high-throughput screening in drug discovery: different strategies and formats.

Authors:  P Seneci; S Miertus
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.943

2.  Comments on the design of chemical libraries for screening.

Authors:  H O Villar; R T Koehler
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.943

3.  Filtering databases and chemical libraries.

Authors:  Paul S Charifson; W Patrick Walters
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 4.  Exploring privileged structures: the combinatorial synthesis of cyclic peptides.

Authors:  Douglas A Horton; Gregory T Bourne; Mark L Smythe
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  A reagent-based strategy for the design of large combinatorial libraries: a preliminary experimental validation.

Authors:  Gergely M Makara; Huw Nash; Zhongli Zheng; Jean-Paul A Orminati; Edward A Wintner
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.943

Review 6.  Exploring privileged structures: the combinatorial synthesis of cyclic peptides.

Authors:  Douglas A Horton; Gregory T Bourne; Mark L Smythe
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.943

Review 7.  Filtering databases and chemical libraries.

Authors:  Paul S Charifson; W Patrick Walters
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.943

8.  Fast 3D molecular superposition and similarity search in databases of flexible molecules.

Authors:  Andreas Krämer; Hans W Horn; Julia E Rice
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Measuring CAMD technique performance: a virtual screening case study in the design of validation experiments.

Authors:  Andrew C Good; Mark A Hermsmeier; S A Hindle
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Descriptors you can count on? Normalized and filtered pharmacophore descriptors for virtual screening.

Authors:  Andrew C Good; Sung-Jin Cho; Jonathan S Mason
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.