Literature DB >> 10463495

The effects of pulsatile versus nonpulsatile perfusion on blood viscoelasticity before and after deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in a neonatal piglet model.

A Undar1, N Henderson, G B Thurston, T Masai, E A Beyer, O H Frazier, C D Fraser.   

Abstract

Blood trauma increases blood viscoelasticity by increasing red cell aggregation and plasma viscosity and by decreasing cell deformability. During extracorporeal circulation, the mode of perfusion (pulsatile or nonpulsatile) may have a significant impact on blood trauma. In this study, a hydraulically driven dual chamber pulsatile pump system was compared to a standard nonpulsatile roller pump in terms of changes in the blood viscosity and elasticity during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and pre and post deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA). Piglets, with an average weight of 3 kg, were used in the pulsatile (n = 5) or nonpulsatile group (n = 5). All animals were subjected to 25 min of hypothermia, 60 min of DHCA, 10 min of cold reperfusion, and 40 min of rewarming with a pump flow of 150 ml/kg/min. A pump rate of 150 bpm, pump ejection time of 120 ms, and stroke volume of 1 ml/kg were used during pulsatile CPB. Arterial blood samples were taken pre-CPB (36 degrees C), during normothermic CPB (35 degrees C), during hypothermic CPB (25 degrees C), pre-DHCA (18 degrees C), post-DHCA (19 degrees C), post-rewarming (35 degrees C), and post-CPB (36 degrees C). Viscosity and elasticity were measured at 2 Hz and 22 degrees C and at strains of 0.2, 1, and 5 using the Vilastic-3 Viscoelasticity Analyzer. Results suggest that the dual chamber neonate-infant pulsatile pump system produces less blood trauma than the standard nonpulsatile roller pump as indicated by lower values of both viscosity and elasticity during CPB support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10463495     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.1999.06408.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  6 in total

1.  Changing pulsatility by delaying the rotational speed phasing of a rotary left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Kazuma Date; Takashi Nishimura; Mamoru Arakawa; Yoshiaki Takewa; Satoru Kishimoto; Akihide Umeki; Masahiko Ando; Toshihide Mizuno; Tomonori Tsukiya; Minoru Ono; Eisuke Tatsumi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 1.731

2.  Mechanical properties of hepatocellular carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Gang Zhang; Mian Long; Zhe-Zhi Wu; Wei-Qun Yu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Continuous and Pulsatile Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device Hemodynamics with a Viscoelastic Blood Model.

Authors:  Bryan C Good; Steven Deutsch; Keefe B Manning
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 2.495

4.  Effects of pulsatile minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation on fibrinolysis and organ protection in adult cardiac surgery-a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Angelika Graßler; Robert Bauernschmitt; Irene Guthoff; Andreas Kunert; Markus Hoenicka; Günter Albrecht; Andreas Liebold
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Hemodynamic effects of various support modes of continuous flow LVADs on the cardiovascular system: a numerical study.

Authors:  Zhiming Song; Kaiyun Gu; Bin Gao; Feng Wan; Yu Chang; Yi Zeng
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-05-05

6.  The Effect of Pulsatile Versus Nonpulsatile Blood Flow on Viscoelasticity and Red Blood Cell Aggregation in Extracorporeal Circulation.

Authors:  Chi Bum Ahn; Yang Jun Kang; Myoung Gon Kim; Sung Yang; Choon Hak Lim; Ho Sung Son; Ji Sung Kim; So Young Lee; Kuk Hui Son; Kyung Sun
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-06-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.