Literature DB >> 10463130

Anti-aliased three-dimensional cone-beam reconstruction of low-contrast objects with algebraic methods.

K Mueller1, R Yagel, J J Wheller.   

Abstract

This paper examines the use of the algebraic reconstruction technique (ART) and related techniques to reconstruct 3-D objects from a relatively sparse set of cone-beam projections. Although ART has been widely used for cone-beam reconstruction of high-contrast objects, e.g., in computed angiography, the work presented here explores the more challenging low-contrast case which represents a little-investigated scenario for ART. Preliminary experiments indicate that for cone angles greater than 20 degrees, traditional ART produces reconstructions with strong aliasing artifacts. These artifacts are in addition to the usual off-midplane inaccuracies of cone-beam tomography with planar orbits. We find that the source of these artifacts is the nonuniform reconstruction grid sampling and correction by the cone-beam rays during the ART projection-backprojection procedure. A new method to compute the weights of the reconstruction matrix is devised, which replaces the usual constant-size interpolation filter by one whose size and amplitude is dependent on the source-voxel distance. This enables the generation of reconstructions free of cone-beam aliasing artifacts, at only little extra cost. An alternative analysis reveals that simultaneous ART (SART) also produces reconstructions without aliasing artifacts, however, at greater computational cost. Finally, we thoroughly investigate the influence of various ART parameters, such as volume initialization, relaxation coefficient lambda, correction scheme, number of iterations, and noise in the projection data on reconstruction quality. We find that ART typically requires only three iterations to render satisfactory reconstruction results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10463130     DOI: 10.1109/42.781017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  9 in total

1.  Refraction corrected transmission ultrasound computed tomography for application in breast imaging.

Authors:  Shengying Li; Marcel Jackowski; Donald P Dione; Trond Varslot; Lawrence H Staib; Klaus Mueller
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Artefacts in CBCT: a review.

Authors:  R Schulze; U Heil; D Gross; D D Bruellmann; E Dranischnikow; U Schwanecke; E Schoemer
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  3D forward and back-projection for X-ray CT using separable footprints.

Authors:  Yong Long; Jeffrey A Fessler; James M Balter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 4.  GPU-based high-performance computing for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Xun Jia; Peter Ziegenhein; Steve B Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  High-performance iterative electron tomography reconstruction with long-object compensation using graphics processing units (GPUs).

Authors:  Wei Xu; Fang Xu; Mel Jones; Bettina Keszthelyi; John Sedat; David Agard; Klaus Mueller
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2010-04-04       Impact factor: 2.867

6.  High resolution 3D imaging of ex-vivo biological samples by micro CT.

Authors:  Amnon Sharir; Gregory Ramniceanu; Vlad Brumfeld
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Compensating the intensity fall-off effect in cone-beam tomography by an empirical weight formula.

Authors:  Zikuan Chen; Vince D Calhoun; Shengjiang Chang
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 1.980

Review 8.  Applications of linac-mounted kilovoltage Cone-beam Computed Tomography in modern radiation therapy: A review.

Authors:  Kavitha Srinivasan; Mohammad Mohammadi; Justin Shepherd
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-03

9.  Influence of Head Motion on the Accuracy of 3D Reconstruction with Cone-Beam CT: Landmark Identification Errors in Maxillofacial Surface Model.

Authors:  Kyung-Min Lee; Jin-Myoung Song; Jin-Hyoung Cho; Hyeon-Shik Hwang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.