Literature DB >> 10462797

Correlational analysis of acoustic cues for the discrimination of auditory motion.

R A Lutfi1, W Wang.   

Abstract

The sound of a source moving in a straight path and passing directly in front of the listener on the azimuthal plane was synthesized over headphones to include three dynamic cues for motion: Doppler effect, overall intensity, and interaural time difference. Discriminability of a change in displacement, velocity, and acceleration of this source was measured using a standard two-interval, forced-choice procedure. In each case, the relative reliance or weight given to the three acoustic cues was estimated from correlations of the listener's response with small independent pertubations imposed on cues from trial to trial. Group estimates of threshold agreed well with results from past studies, while the obtained pattern of weights depended on the individual, starting velocity, and discrimination task. For the discrimination of displacement at moderate velocity (10 m/s), responses were most highly correlated with intensity or interaural time difference. For the discrimination of velocity and, to a lesser extent, acceleration, responses were most highly correlated with Doppler effect. At higher velocity (50 m/s) responses in all discrimination tasks were most strongly correlated with Doppler effect with few exceptions. Randomizing source spectrum or roving distance of the source from trial to trial did not significantly affect the pattern of results. The results suggest that motion perception is mutable, and not in all cases based on a single invariant acoustic cue.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10462797     DOI: 10.1121/1.428033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  The Doppler effect is not what you think it is: dramatic pitch change due to dynamic intensity change.

Authors:  Michael K McBeath; John G Neuhoff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

2.  Psychophysical reverse correlation with multiple response alternatives.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Neural binaural sensitivity at high sound speeds: Single cell responses in cat midbrain to fast-changing interaural time differences of broadband sounds.

Authors:  Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory perception of motor vehicle travel paths.

Authors:  Daniel H Ashmead; D Wesley Grantham; Erin S Maloff; Benjamin Hornsby; Takabun Nakamura; Timothy J Davis; Faith Pampel; Erin G Rushing
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  Evidence for impaired sound intensity processing in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Dominik R Bach; Karin Buxtorf; Werner K Strik; John G Neuhoff; Erich Seifritz
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Effects of auditory information on self-motion perception during simultaneous presentation of visual shearing motion.

Authors:  Shigehito Tanahashi; Kaoru Ashihara; Hiroyasu Ujike
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-11

7.  The influence of imagery vividness on cognitive and perceptual cues in circular auditorily-induced vection.

Authors:  Aleksander Väljamäe; Sara Sell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-12-03

8.  Discrimination contours for moving sounds reveal duration and distance cues dominate auditory speed perception.

Authors:  Tom C A Freeman; Johahn Leung; Ella Wufong; Emily Orchard-Mills; Simon Carlile; David Alais
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The Perception of Auditory Motion.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Johahn Leung
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Sensitivity to Angular and Radial Source Movements as a Function of Acoustic Complexity in Normal and Impaired Hearing.

Authors:  Micha Lundbeck; Giso Grimm; Volker Hohmann; Søren Laugesen; Tobias Neher
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.