Literature DB >> 10462719

Significance of the perigametic interval as a major source of spontaneous mutations that result in mosaics.

L B Russell1.   

Abstract

An earlier analysis showed that a significant percentage of spontaneous specific-locus mutations in mice are recovered as mosaics and that the spontaneous mutation rate per cell cycle is probably higher for those mutations that produce mosaics than for those that produce whole-body mutants. The finding that the average germline composition of the mosaics was approximately 50% supported the suggestion that single-strand DNA alterations during the perigametic interval constitute the major source of spontaneous mosaics. Here, alternative origins of 50% germline mosaicism are examined. Supporting the earlier hypothesis is the finding that spontaneous mutations that are recovered as clusters constitute a different array of types from those giving rise to singletons, and the evidence from interspecies comparisons that a unique component of the life cycle, probably meiosis, makes a major contribution to spontaneous mutations. Biological factors associated with the perigametic interval were examined in an effort to suggest explanations for the observations that 1) the spontaneous mutation rate in that interval is high relative to that characterizing any mitotic cell cycle, 2) the types of mutations appear to be different from those arising during mitotic divisions, and 3) the spontaneous mutation rate for males is higher than that for females. It is concluded that the higher yield from the perigametic interval is consistent with what is known about methylation status in development of both sexes and with repair capacity in the male germline. For both parameters, differences between the sexes during their respective perigametic intervals may be at least partly responsible for the fact that the spontaneous mutation rate of mammalian females is lower than that of males. Copyright 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10462719     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2280(1999)34:1<16::aid-em3>3.0.co;2-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  8 in total

1.  Molecular and phenotypic analysis of 25 recessive, homozygous-viable alleles at the mouse agouti locus.

Authors:  Rosalynn J Miltenberger; Kazumasa Wakamatsu; Shosuke Ito; Richard P Woychik; Liane B Russell; Edward J Michaud
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The evolution of haploid, diploid and polymorphic haploid-diploid life cycles: the role of meiotic mutation.

Authors:  D W Hall
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Chaos and order in spontaneous mutation.

Authors:  John W Drake
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Comparison of the genetic effects of equimolar doses of ENU and MNU: while the chemicals differ dramatically in their mutagenicity in stem-cell spermatogonia, both elicit very high mutation rates in differentiating spermatogonia.

Authors:  Liane B Russell; Patricia R Hunsicker; William L Russell
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Meiotic interstrand DNA damage escapes paternal repair and causes chromosomal aberrations in the zygote by maternal misrepair.

Authors:  Francesco Marchetti; Jack Bishop; John Gingerich; Andrew J Wyrobek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  In Utero Exposure to Benzo[a]Pyrene Increases Mutation Burden in the Soma and Sperm of Adult Mice.

Authors:  Matthew J Meier; Jason M O'Brien; Marc A Beal; Beverly Allan; Carole L Yauk; Francesco Marchetti
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Similarities and differences in patterns of germline mutation between mice and humans.

Authors:  Sarah J Lindsay; Raheleh Rahbari; Joanna Kaplanis; Thomas Keane; Matthew E Hurles
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  The Selby-Russell Dispute Regarding the Nonreporting of Critical Data in the Mega-Mouse Experiments of Drs William and Liane Russell That Spanned Many Decades: What Happened, Current Status, and Some Ramifications.

Authors:  P B Selby
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.658

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.