Literature DB >> 10461580

Systematic validation of disease models for pharmacoeconomic evaluations. Swiss HIV Cohort Study.

P P Sendi1, B A Craig, D Pfluger, A Gafni, H C Bucher.   

Abstract

Pharmacoeconomic evaluations are often based on computer models which simulate the course of disease with and without medical interventions. The purpose of this study is to propose and illustrate a rigorous approach for validating such disease models. For illustrative purposes, we applied this approach to a computer-based model we developed to mimic the history of HIV-infected subjects at the greatest risk for Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection in Switzerland. The drugs included as a prophylactic intervention against MAC infection were azithromycin and clarithromycin. We used a homogenous Markov chain to describe the progression of an HIV-infected patient through six MAC-free states, one MAC state, and death. Probability estimates were extracted from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study database (1993-95) and randomized controlled trials. The model was validated testing for (1) technical validity (2) predictive validity (3) face validity and (4) modelling process validity. Sensitivity analysis and independent model implementation in DATA (PPS) and self-written Fortran 90 code (BAC) assured technical validity. Agreement between modelled and observed MAC incidence confirmed predictive validity. Modelled MAC prophylaxis at different starting conditions affirmed face validity. Published articles by other authors supported modelling process validity. The proposed validation procedure is a useful approach to improve the validity of the model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10461580     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.1999.00174.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  9 in total

Review 1.  Good practice guidelines for decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment: a review and consolidation of quality assessment.

Authors:  Zoë Philips; Laura Bojke; Mark Sculpher; Karl Claxton; Su Golder
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Comparing three software tools for implementing markov models for health economic evaluations.

Authors:  Petra Menn; Rolf Holle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Internal validation of models with several interventions.

Authors:  Afschin Gandjour; Amiram Gafni
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2012-11-03

4.  Markov chains and semi-Markov models in time-to-event analysis.

Authors:  Erin L Abner; Richard J Charnigo; Richard J Kryscio
Journal:  J Biom Biostat       Date:  2013-10-25

5.  Strengthening health systems to improve the value of tuberculosis diagnostics in South Africa: A cost and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Nicola Foster; Lucy Cunnama; Kerrigan McCarthy; Lebogang Ramma; Mariana Siapka; Edina Sinanovic; Gavin Churchyard; Katherine Fielding; Alison D Grant; Susan Cleary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Cost-effectiveness of genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing in HIV-infected patients with treatment failure.

Authors:  Pedram Sendi; Huldrych F Günthard; Mathew Simcock; Bruno Ledergerber; Jörg Schüpbach; Manuel Battegay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Methods to construct a step-by-step beginner's guide to decision analytic cost-effectiveness modeling.

Authors:  Tamlyn Rautenberg; Claire Hulme; Richard Edlin
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2016-10-11

8.  Designing and validating a Markov model for hospital-based addiction consult service impact on 12-month drug and non-drug related mortality.

Authors:  Caroline A King; Honora Englander; P Todd Korthuis; Joshua A Barocas; K John McConnell; Cynthia D Morris; Ryan Cook
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  A novel Markov model projecting costs and outcomes of providing antiretroviral therapy to public patients in private practices versus public clinics in South Africa.

Authors:  Rory Leisegang; Gary Maartens; Michael Hislop; John Sargent; Ernest Darkoh; Susan Cleary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.