Literature DB >> 10461334

Evaluation of ultrasound-estimated date of delivery in 17,450 spontaneous singleton births: do we need to modify Naegele's rule?

T H Nguyen1, T Larsen, G Engholm, H Møller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the size of error in the predicted date of delivery by biparietal diameter (BPD) and last menstrual period (LMP) in different clinical models.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Predicted dates of delivery were calculated in 14,805 spontaneous deliveries with a reliable date of LMP using two assumptions: average length of pregnancy of 280 and of 282 days. Errors in these calculated dates were tested when used alone or combined, i.e. the LMP-predicted date of delivery was used as first choice unless the discrepancy between gestational age calculated by BPD and LMP exceeded 7, 10 or 14 days.
RESULTS: The average discrepancy (error) between predicted date of delivery from BPD and LMP and date of spontaneous delivery was 7.96 and 8.63 days, respectively (p < 0.0001). Adding 282 instead of 280 days to the first day of the LMP reduced the error of the LMP method from 8.63 to 8.41 days, reduced the percentage of classified post-term deliveries from 7.9 to 5.2% and increased the preterm births from 3.96 to 4.48%. No models of combined use of LMP and BPD were superior to the use of BPD alone.
CONCLUSION: If both BPD and LMP are available, BPD should be used to predict term. If only LMP is available, term should be calculated as the first date of the LMP plus 282.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10461334     DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.14010023.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  8 in total

1.  Toward point-of-care ultrasound estimation of fetal gestational age from the trans-cerebellar diameter using CNN-based ultrasound image analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad A Maraci; Mohammad Yaqub; Rachel Craik; Sridevi Beriwal; Alice Self; Peter von Dadelszen; Aris Papageorghiou; J Alison Noble
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-01-13

2.  Trends in All-Cause Mortality across Gestational Age in Days for Children Born at Term.

Authors:  Chun Sen Wu; Yuelian Sun; Ellen Aagaard Nohr; Jørn Olsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  An epigenetic clock for gestational age at birth based on blood methylation data.

Authors:  Anna K Knight; Jeffrey M Craig; Christiane Theda; Marie Bækvad-Hansen; Jonas Bybjerg-Grauholm; Christine S Hansen; Mads V Hollegaard; David M Hougaard; Preben B Mortensen; Shantel M Weinsheimer; Thomas M Werge; Patricia A Brennan; Joseph F Cubells; D Jeffrey Newport; Zachary N Stowe; Jeanie L Y Cheong; Philippa Dalach; Lex W Doyle; Yuk J Loke; Andrea A Baccarelli; Allan C Just; Robert O Wright; Mara M Téllez-Rojo; Katherine Svensson; Letizia Trevisi; Elizabeth M Kennedy; Elisabeth B Binder; Stella Iurato; Darina Czamara; Katri Räikkönen; Jari M T Lahti; Anu-Katriina Pesonen; Eero Kajantie; Pia M Villa; Hannele Laivuori; Esa Hämäläinen; Hea Jin Park; Lynn B Bailey; Sasha E Parets; Varun Kilaru; Ramkumar Menon; Steve Horvath; Nicole R Bush; Kaja Z LeWinn; Frances A Tylavsky; Karen N Conneely; Alicia K Smith
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 13.583

4.  Ultrasound-based gestational-age estimation in late pregnancy.

Authors:  A T Papageorghiou; B Kemp; W Stones; E O Ohuma; S H Kennedy; M Purwar; L J Salomon; D G Altman; J A Noble; E Bertino; M G Gravett; R Pang; L Cheikh Ismail; F C Barros; A Lambert; Y A Jaffer; C G Victora; Z A Bhutta; J Villar
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  Estimated date of delivery with electronic medical records by a hybrid GBDT-GRU model.

Authors:  Yina Wu; Yichao Zhang; Xu Zou; Zhenming Yuan; Wensheng Hu; Sha Lu; Xiaoyan Sun; Yingfei Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Fetal age assessment based on 2nd trimester ultrasound in Africa and the effect of ethnicity.

Authors:  Daniel Salpou; Torvid Kiserud; Svein Rasmussen; Synnøve Lian Johnsen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Dating of Pregnancy in First versus Second Trimester in Relation to Post-Term Birth Rate: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ida Näslund Thagaard; Lone Krebs; Ulrik Lausten-Thomsen; Severin Olesen Larsen; Jens-Christian Holm; Michael Christiansen; Torben Larsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Changes in data management contribute to temporal variation in gestational duration distribution in the Swedish Medical Birth Registry.

Authors:  Dominika Modzelewska; Pol Sole-Navais; Anna Sandstrom; Ge Zhang; Louis J Muglia; Christopher Flatley; Staffan Nilsson; Bo Jacobsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.