Literature DB >> 10460906

Laparoscopic colectomy yields similar morbidity and disability regardless of patient age.

A J Iroatulam1, H H Chen, F M Potenti, S Parameswaran, S D Wexner.   

Abstract

This study compared the outcome factors of morbidity and the length of disability in older and younger patients following laparoscopic colorectal surgery. All patients undergoing laparoscopic segmental resection during the study period were included. Morbidity was determined by reviewing the medical records, and disability by a patient-administered questionnaire. The series was divided into two age cohorts (</=64 and >/=65 years), which did not differ significantly in gender or type of procedure. Between these two groups we found no significant differences in mean duration of ileus (3.3 days in both groups), the mean length of hospitalization (5.7 vs. 6.3 days, respectively), morbidity rate (18% vs. 21%), or time until returning to partial activity (1.6 vs. 1.6 weeks) or to full activity (3 vs. 2 weeks). Our findings demonstrate that neither the morbidity rate nor the disability period after laparoscopic techniques differ between elderly and younger patients. We therefore endorse the use of laparoscopy regardless of patient age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10460906     DOI: 10.1007/s003840050202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  9 in total

1.  Laparoscopy for benign colorectal diseases.

Authors:  Thomas Shin; Janice F Rafferty
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-02

2.  Do elderly patients benefit from laparoscopic colorectal surgery?

Authors:  B Person; S M Cera; D R Sands; E G Weiss; A M Vernava; J J Nogueras; S D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic colectomy in the elderly: when is too old?

Authors:  Matthew G Mutch
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2006-02

4.  Optimizing cost and short-term outcomes for elderly patients in laparoscopic colonic surgery.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Justin K Lawrence; Tamar Nobel; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Effectiveness of colorectal laparoscopic surgery on patients at high anesthetic risk: an intervention cohort study.

Authors:  I Arteaga González; E M López-Tomassetti Fernández; Y Hernández Piñero; A Martín Malagón; J Arranz Durán; S Bethencourt Muñoz; H Díaz; A Carrillo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Personalized surgical management of colorectal cancer in elderly population.

Authors:  Giampaolo Ugolini; Federico Ghignone; Davide Zattoni; Giacomo Veronese; Isacco Montroni
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection from a Western perspective: Today's promises and future challenges.

Authors:  José Carlos Marín-Gabriel; Gloria Fernández-Esparrach; José Díaz-Tasende; Alberto Herreros de Tejada
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-01-25

Review 8.  Practical considerations for colorectal cancer screening in older adults.

Authors:  Dana Gornick; Anusri Kadakuntla; Alexa Trovato; Rebecca Stetzer; Micheal Tadros
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-06-15

9.  Comparison of long-term outcome between hemicolectomy and partial colectomy in the elderly: a large population-based study.

Authors:  Xu Guan; Hanqing Hu; Wei Chen; Zheng Jiang; Zheng Liu; Zhixun Zhao; Yinggang Chen; Guiyu Wang; Xishan Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.