Literature DB >> 10460414

Chromosome engineering: generation of mono- and dicentric isochromosomes in a somatic cell hybrid system.

A W Higgins1, M G Schueler, H F Willard.   

Abstract

The most common isochromosome found in humans involves the long arm of the X, i(Xq), and is associated with a subset of Turner syndrome cases. To study the formation and behavior of isochromosomes in a more tractable experimental system, we have developed a somatic cell hybrid model system that allows for the selection of mono- or dicentric isochromosomes involving the short arm of the X, i(Xp). Simultaneous positive and negative counterselection of a mouse/human somatic cell hybrid containing a human X chromosome, selecting for retention of the UBE1 locus in Xp but against the HPRT locus in Xq, results in a variety of abnormalities of the X chromosome involving deletions of Xq. We have generated 70 such "Pushmi-Pullyu" hybrids derived from seven independent X chromosomes. Cytogenetic analysis of these hybrids using fluorescence in situ hybridization showed i(Xp) chromosomes in approximately 19% of the hybrids. Southern blot and polymerase chain reaction analyses of the Pushmi-Pullyu hybrids revealed a distribution of breakpoints along Xq. The distance between the centromeres of the dicentric i(Xp)s generated ranged from approximately 2 Mb to approximately 20 Mb. To examine centromeric activity in these dicentric i(Xp)s, we used indirect immunofluorescence with antibodies to centromere protein E (CENP-E). CENP-E was detected at only one of the centromeres of a dicentric i(Xp) with approximately 2-3 Mb of Xq DNA. In contrast, CENP-E was detected at both centromeres of a dicentric i(Xp) with approximately 14 Mb of Xq DNA. Two other dicentric i(Xp) chromosomes were heterogeneous with respect to centromeric activity, suggesting that centromeric activity and chromosome stability of dicentric chromosomes may be more complicated than previously thought. The Pushmi-Pullyu model system presented in this study may provide a tool for examining the structure and function of mammalian centromeres.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10460414     DOI: 10.1007/s004120050376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  10 in total

1.  Co-localization of centromere activity, proteins and topoisomerase II within a subdomain of the major human X alpha-satellite array.

Authors:  Jennifer M Spence; Ricky Critcher; Thomas A Ebersole; Manuel M Valdivia; William C Earnshaw; Tatsuo Fukagawa; Christine J Farr
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 2.  Dicentric chromosomes: unique models to study centromere function and inactivation.

Authors:  Kaitlin M Stimpson; Justyne E Matheny; Beth A Sullivan
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Engineered human dicentric chromosomes show centromere plasticity.

Authors:  Anne W Higgins; Karen M Gustashaw; Huntington F Willard
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Centromere inactivation on a neo-Y fusion chromosome in threespine stickleback fish.

Authors:  Jennifer N Cech; Catherine L Peichel
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Telomere disruption results in non-random formation of de novo dicentric chromosomes involving acrocentric human chromosomes.

Authors:  Kaitlin M Stimpson; Ihn Young Song; Anna Jauch; Heidi Holtgreve-Grez; Karen E Hayden; Joanna M Bridger; Beth A Sullivan
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 5.917

6.  Human artificial chromosomes with alpha satellite-based de novo centromeres show increased frequency of nondisjunction and anaphase lag.

Authors:  M Katharine Rudd; Robert W Mays; Stuart Schwartz; Huntington F Willard
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 7.  Here, there, and everywhere: kinetochore function on holocentric chromosomes.

Authors:  A F Dernburg
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-06-11       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Induced dicentric chromosome formation promotes genomic rearrangements and tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Karen E Gascoigne; Iain M Cheeseman
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  The role of dicentric chromosome formation and secondary centromere deletion in the evolution of myeloid malignancy.

Authors:  Ruth N Mackinnon; Lynda J Campbell
Journal:  Genet Res Int       Date:  2011-09-27

Review 10.  The dark side of centromeres: types, causes and consequences of structural abnormalities implicating centromeric DNA.

Authors:  V Barra; D Fachinetti
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 14.919

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.