Literature DB >> 10459880

Can echocardiography identify mildly hypertensive patients at high risk, left untreated based on current guidelines?

E Abergel1, G Chatellier, C Battaglia, J Menard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the decision to treat uncomplicated mild hypertension with drugs, in accordance with the World Health Organization - International Society of Hypertension (WHO/ISH) guidelines based on a series of blood pressure (BP) measurements over 6 months, resulted in the treatment of patients at high risk on the basis of echocardiography.
METHODS: One hundred and eighteen patients with mild hypertension (diastolic blood pressure 90-105 mm Hg and/or systolic blood pressure 140-180 mm Hg) were examined by echocardiography at inclusion and followed up for 6 months by a single physician unaware of the echographic results.
RESULTS: Drug treatment was given to 48 patients, and 70 remained untreated. Treated patients had higher echographic indices than untreated patients (all P<0.05): left ventricular (LV) mass/body surface area (83.0+/-15.6 versus 75.3+/-14.8 g/m2), inter-ventricular septal thickness (9.7+/-1.7 versus 8.5+/-1.3 mm), LV posterior wall thickness (8.4+/-1.1 versus 7.8+/-1.1 mm), relative wall thickness (0.37+/-0.06 versus 0.34+/-0.06). LV geometry was normal in 98 patients, and 20 had LV concentric remodelling. The 10-year coronary disease risk (Framingham equation) was higher in the 20 patients with concentric remodelling than in those with normal LV geometry (10.4 versus 4.2%; P<0.005). Nine of these 20 patients were still untreated at the end of the 6-month follow-up period.
CONCLUSION: Rigorous application of the WHO/ISH clinical guidelines in a group of mild hypertensive patients led to the treatment of patients with slightly higher LV mass and more concentric LV geometry than were found in those not treated. However, a high-risk subgroup, with concentric remodelling, was not identified and left untreated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10459880     DOI: 10.1097/00004872-199917060-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  4 in total

1.  Echocardiographic evaluation of left and right ventricular function in mild hypertension.

Authors:  S R Mittal; R V Barar; H Arora
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  A prospective comparison of four antihypertensive agents in daily clinical practice.

Authors:  C Campo; J Segura; M L Fernández; L Guerrero; H Christiansen; L M Ruilope
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Left ventricular relative wall thickness versus left ventricular mass index in non-cardioembolic stroke patients.

Authors:  M-Sherif Hashem; Hayrapet Kalashyan; Jonathan Choy; Soon K Chiew; Abdel-Hakim Shawki; Ahmed H Dawood; Harald Becher
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Is Peri-Operative Isolated Systolic Hypertension (ISH) a Cardiac Risk Factor?

Authors:  Ashraf Fayad; Homer Yang
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2008-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.