Literature DB >> 10458887

An experimental study of behavioural group size effects in tammar wallabies, Macropus eugenii.

.   

Abstract

As animals aggregate with others, the time they allot to social and nonsocial activities changes. Antipredator models of vigilance and foraging group size effects both predict a nonlinear relationship between group size and the time allocated to behaviour. Group size effects were experimentally studied in captive adult female tammar wallabies, a small macropodid marsupial, by increasing group size from 1 to 10. Tammars foraged more, looked less, groomed more, engaged in more aggressive interactions and moved about less as group size increased. Nonlinear regression models explained more variation in the time allocated to foraging, looking, locomotion and affiliative behaviour than linear models. Variation in self-grooming and aggression was better explained by linear models. Wallabies lay down significantly more, and walked significantly less, as group size increased: these relationships were significantly nonlinear. Thus, changes in perceived predation risk, which are characterized by nonlinear relationships, explain tammar wallaby group size effects for most activities. These results support the assertion that predation has played an important role in macropodid social evolution. Moreover, the findings suggest that conservation biologists should pay particular attention to group size when translocating or reintroducing endangered macropodids. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 10458887     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  10 in total

1.  A simple rule for the costs of vigilance: empirical evidence from a social forager.

Authors:  Guy Cowlishaw; Michael J Lawes; Margaret Lightbody; Alison Martin; Richard Pettifor; J Marcus Rowcliffe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Competition in foraging flocks of migrating semipalmated sandpipers.

Authors:  Guy Beauchamp
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-08-04       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The loss of anti-predator behaviour following isolation on islands.

Authors:  Daniel T Blumstein; Janice C Daniel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Small increases in group size improve small shoals' response to water flow in zebrafish.

Authors:  Piyumika S Suriyampola; Alec A Iruri-Tucker; Lyan Padilla-Veléz; Alejandra Enriquez; Delia S Shelton; Emília P Martins
Journal:  J Zool (1987)       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 2.394

5.  Learning from the mistakes of others: How female elk (Cervus elaphus) adjust behaviour with age to avoid hunters.

Authors:  Henrik Thurfjell; Simone Ciuti; Mark S Boyce
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Limb bone scaling in hopping macropods and quadrupedal artiodactyls.

Authors:  Michael Doube; Alessandro A Felder; Melissa Y Chua; Kalyani Lodhia; Michał M Kłosowski; John R Hutchinson; Sandra J Shefelbine
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Individual play patterns stimulated by a familiar object are group-driven.

Authors:  Manja Zupan; Therese Rehn; Daiana de Oliveira; Špela Malovrh; Linda Keeling
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Causal evidence for the adaptive benefits of social foraging in the wild.

Authors:  Lysanne Snijders; Stefan Krause; Alan N Tump; Michael Breuker; Chente Ortiz; Sofia Rizzi; Indar W Ramnarine; Jens Krause; Ralf H J M Kurvers
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-01-20

9.  Rates of agonism among female primates: a cross-taxon perspective.

Authors:  Brandon C Wheeler; Clara J Scarry; Andreas Koenig
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 2.671

10.  Costs of Rearing the Wrong Sex: Cross-Fostering to Manipulate Offspring Sex in Tammar Wallabies.

Authors:  Lisa E Schwanz; Kylie A Robert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.