Literature DB >> 10458882

Chicken food calls are functionally referential.

.   

Abstract

Male chickens, Gallus gallus domesticus, usually produce characteristic 'food' calls upon discovering edible objects, and are more likely to do so in the presence of a hen. Food calling is thus dependent upon food and modulated by social context, which is consistent with the idea that hens respond because they anticipate a feeding opportunity. An alternative model suggests that female behaviour is not mediated by the predicted presence of food but rather by social information, such as a low probability of male aggression. We conducted two playback experiments to explore the type of information encoded in food-associated vocal signals. Isolated hens were played recorded food calls and we compared their responses with those evoked by ground alarm calls (which have similar acoustic characteristics) and by contact calls (which are produced under similar social circumstances). Hens responded to food call playbacks by fixating downwards with the frontal binocular field. This anticipatory feeding movement was specific to food calls and did not occur in either of the control conditions. Food calls also affected looking downwards selectively. There were no differences between the call types in their effects on social behaviour, such as approach and contact calling, nor were there differences in the nonspecific effects of sound playback, such as orienting towards the loudspeaker or increased locomotor activity. Chicken food calls appear to provide conspecifics with information about the presence of food. This property has not hitherto been demonstrated in any natural system of animal acoustic signals. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 10458882     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  18 in total

1.  Development, direction, and damage limitation: social learning in domestic fowl.

Authors:  Christine J Nicol
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Social calls predict foraging success in big brown bats.

Authors:  Genevieve Spanjer Wright; Chen Chiu; Wei Xian; Gerald S Wilkinson; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Sound amplification by means of a horn-like roosting structure in Spix's disc-winged bat.

Authors:  Gloriana Chaverri; Erin H Gillam
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Automated bioacoustics: methods in ecology and conservation and their potential for animal welfare monitoring.

Authors:  Michael P Mcloughlin; Rebecca Stewart; Alan G McElligott
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  The Evolution of Food Calls: Vocal Behaviour of Sooty Mangabeys in the Presence of Food.

Authors:  Fredy Quintero; Sonia Touitou; Martina Magris; Klaus Zuberbühler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-30

6.  Representational signalling in birds.

Authors:  Christopher S Evans; Linda Evans
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 7.  Epigenesis of behavioural lateralization in humans and other animals.

Authors:  S M Schaafsma; B J Riedstra; K A Pfannkuche; A Bouma; T G G Groothuis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Bonobos extract meaning from call sequences.

Authors:  Zanna Clay; Klaus Zuberbühler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Repeatability in the contact calling system of Spix's disc-winged bat (Thyroptera tricolor).

Authors:  Gloriana Chaverri; Erin H Gillam
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Can vocal conditioning trigger a semiotic ratchet in marmosets?

Authors:  Hjalmar K Turesson; Sidarta Ribeiro
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.