Literature DB >> 10458498

Bridging the knowledge gap and communicating uncertainties for informed consent in cervical cytology screening; we need unbiased information and a culture change.

C M Anderson1, J Nottingham.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10458498     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.1999.00198.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytopathology        ISSN: 0956-5507            Impact factor:   2.073


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

1.  Gaining informed consent for screening. Is difficult--but many misconceptions need to be undone.

Authors:  J Austoker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

2.  Information about screening - is it to achieve high uptake or to ensure informed choice?

Authors:  A E Raffle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 3.  Increasing informed uptake and non-uptake of screening: evidence from a systematic review.

Authors:  R G Jepson; C A Forbes; A J Sowden; R A Lewis
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Women need better information on routine mammography: understanding of principles of screening must be improved.

Authors:  John Nottingham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-10-11

5.  How should we measure informed choice? The case of cancer screening.

Authors:  R G Jepson; J Hewison; A G H Thompson; D Weller
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Outcomes of screening to prevent cancer: analysis of cumulative incidence of cervical abnormality and modelling of cases and deaths prevented.

Authors:  A E Raffle; B Alden; M Quinn; P J Babb; M T Brett
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-26

7.  Public perceptions of communicating information about bowel cancer screening.

Authors:  Chris Woodrow; Eila Watson; Linda Rozmovits; Ronald Parker; Joan Austoker
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Randomised controlled trial of the effect of evidence based information on women's willingness to participate in cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  P Adab; T Marshall; A Rouse; B Randhawa; H Sangha; N Bhangoo
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Cluster-randomised trial of risk communication to enhance informed uptake of cervical screening.

Authors:  Rachel M Holloway; Clare Wilkinson; Tim J Peters; Ian Russell; David Cohen; Janine Hale; Cerilan Rogers; Helen Lewis
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Social patterning of screening uptake and the impact of facilitating informed choices: psychological and ethical analyses.

Authors:  Rachel Crockett; Timothy M Wilkinson; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.