Literature DB >> 10458465

Urinary retention after bilateral extravesical ureteral reimplantation: does dissection distal to the ureteral orifice have a role?

D Barrieras1, S Lapointe, P P Reddy, P Williot, G A McLorie, D Bägli, A E Khoury, P A Merguerian.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the outcome and incidence of urinary retention after bilateral detrusorrhaphy using 2 modifications of the original Lich-Gregoir procedure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the charts of 220 patients who underwent correction of bilateral vesicoureteral reflux using the extravesical approach from January 1991 to December 1997. Inverted Y detrusorrhaphy was performed in 154 patients and the advancing suture modification was done in 66.
RESULTS: The success rate using the advancing suture technique was 92.4 and 95.4% at 3 and 12 months, respectively. The Y detrusorrhaphy technique was successful in 91.6 and 97.4% of cases at 3 and 12 months, respectively. The difference in the techniques was not statistically significant. Urinary retention developed in 8.4% of the patients who underwent Y detrusorrhaphy compared to 15.2% of those who underwent the advancing suture technique (not statistically significant). However, patients with grades IV and V reflux, children younger than 3 years and boys had significantly (p <0.05) higher postoperative retention rates of 24.6, 35.6 and 20.3%, respectively, when all 220 patients were considered.
CONCLUSIONS: Each modification of the original Lich-Gregoir technique is highly effective for treating bilateral vesicoureteral reflux and each is associated with a low rate of temporary urinary retention. Although there seems to be a lower incidence of retention with the Y detrusorrhaphy technique, this was not statistically significant. Because of the higher incidence of urinary retention in young children, boys and/or patients with high grade reflux, we recommend that physicians consider a longer period of catheterization regardless of the technique chosen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10458465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

1.  Prolonged urinary retention can and does occur after any type of ureteral reimplantantion.

Authors:  Martin A Koyle; Hissan Butt; Armando Lorenzo; Gerald C Mingin; Jack S Elder; Grahame H H Smith
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  The demographics and costs of inpatient vesicoureteral reflux management in the USA.

Authors:  John David Spencer; Andrew Schwaderer; Kirk McHugh; Brian Vanderbrink; Brian Becknell; David S Hains
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 3.  Late effects on the urinary bladder in patients treated for cancer in childhood: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Michael Ritchey; Fernando Ferrer; Patricia Shearer; Sheri L Spunt
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 4.  Surgical management of vesicoureteral reflux in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Enver Ozgur; Tanja Becker; Gerald Haupt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  A transperitoneal laparoscopic approach to endourology.

Authors:  A M Kaynan; H N Winfield
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 6.  Lessons learned over a decade of pediatric robotic ureteral reimplantation.

Authors:  Minki Baek; Chester J Koh
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-01-09

7.  Unilateral extravesical ureteral reimplantation via inguinal incision for the correction of vesicoureteral reflux: a 10-year experience.

Authors:  Michael Yap; Unwanabong Nseyo; Hena Din; Madhu Alagiri
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 8.  Management of vesicoureteral reflux in children.

Authors:  S P Greenfield
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.862

9.  Laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation: technique.

Authors:  John-Paul Capolicchio
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2008

10.  Current status of Gil-Vernet trigonoplasty technique.

Authors:  Nasser Simforoosh; Mohammad H Radfar
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2008
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.