Literature DB >> 10457178

Visuospatial attentional functioning in mice: interactions between cholinergic manipulations and genotype.

T Humby1, F M Laird, W Davies, L S Wilkinson.   

Abstract

Attentional functioning in mice was assessed in an analogue of the five-choice serial reaction time task in which the requirement was to detect brief visual stimuli presented across five spatial locations. Two hybrid strains of mice were assessed; F1 C57Bl/6xDBA/2 and C57Bl/6x129sv. Both strains acquired the task to high levels of performance with, in particular, no problems due to premature responding. At performance, systematic manipulation of the task parameters indicated a pattern of effects consistent with the task, taxing aspects of visuospatial attention. There were some differential effects of task manipulations at baseline across strain. However, the pattern of effects suggested these were likely to be the result of effects on factors other than attentional functioning per se, such as behavioural reactivity and inhibition. There was evidence in both strains of specific, centrally mediated effects of scopolamine on attentional functioning, with the C57Bl/6xDBA/2 hybrid showing greater sensitivity to the drug manipulation. Specific effects on discriminative accuracy were observed at doses of 0.02 and 0.2 mg/kg scopolamine. At the 2 mg/kg dose, large reductions in accuracy were associated with large effects on other measures, including omissions and response latencies, suggestive of nonspecific effects on task performance. These data indicate, for the first time, the utility of operant methods in assessing visuospatial attentional functioning in mice. They confirm the importance of cholinergic mechanisms in attentional processes across species, and suggest interactions between cholinergic mechanisms and genotype in the expression of attentional phenotypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10457178     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00701.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  62 in total

1.  Comparative effects of different test day challenges on performance in the 5-choice serial reaction time task.

Authors:  Nurith Amitai; Athina Markou
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 2.  CNTRICS final animal model task selection: control of attention.

Authors:  C Lustig; R Kozak; M Sarter; J W Young; T W Robbins
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Perinatal choline supplementation improves cognitive functioning and emotion regulation in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome.

Authors:  Jisook Moon; May Chen; Shruti U Gandhy; Myla Strawderman; David A Levitsky; Kenneth N Maclean; Barbara J Strupp
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 4.  Mouse models for studying genetic influences on factors determining smoking cessation success in humans.

Authors:  F Scott Hall; Athina Markou; Edward D Levin; George R Uhl
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Assessment of cognitive function in the heterozygous reeler mouse.

Authors:  Dilja D Krueger; Jessica L Howell; Britni F Hebert; Peter Olausson; Jane R Taylor; Angus C Nairn
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Schizophrenia-relevant behavioral testing in rodent models: a uniquely human disorder?

Authors:  Craig M Powell; Tsuyoshi Miyakawa
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  A novel translational assay of response inhibition and impulsivity: effects of prefrontal cortex lesions, drugs used in ADHD, and serotonin 2C receptor antagonism.

Authors:  Trevor Humby; Jessica B Eddy; Mark A Good; Amy C Reichelt; Lawrence S Wilkinson
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Acetylcholine receptor and behavioral deficits in mice lacking apolipoprotein E.

Authors:  Jessica A Siegel; Theodore S Benice; Peter Van Meer; Byung S Park; Jacob Raber
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 9.  Psychopharmacological approaches to modulating attention in the five-choice serial reaction time task: implications for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Y Chudasama; T W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 10.  Consideration of species differences in developing novel molecules as cognition enhancers.

Authors:  Jared W Young; J David Jentsch; Timothy J Bussey; Tanya L Wallace; Daniel M Hutcheson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.