Literature DB >> 10456816

Intrathecal co-administration of NMDA antagonist and NK-1 antagonist reduces MAC of isoflurane in rats.

K Ishizaki1, M Sasaki, S Karasawa, H Obata, T Nara, F Goto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intravenous administration of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists and alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonists reportedly reduce the minimum alveolar anaesthetic concentration (MAC) for inhalation anaesthetics. If pain perception can be prevented by the intrathecal administration of antinociceptive receptor antagonists, these agents may reduce the requirements for inhalation anaesthetics. We studied the effect of intrathecal administration of an AMPA/kainate receptor antagonist, a metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptor antagonist and co-administration of NMDA and a neurokinin-1(NK-1) receptor antagonist drugs at low doses on the MAC.
METHODS: After Wistar rats (n=36) were fitted with indwelling intrathecal catheters, the MAC of isoflurane was determined following intrathecal administration of a non-NMDA receptor antagonist (CNQX) at 10 microg, a mGlu receptor antagonist (AP3) at 10 microg, or a combination of NMDA receptor antagonist (APV) at 0.01 microg to 1 microg with NK-1 receptor antagonist (CP96345, CP) at 0.1 microg to 10 microg. Subsequently, a reversal dose of intrathecal NMDA with substance P (SP) was administered, and the MAC of isoflurane was redetermined. Conscious rats (n=15) were also examined for the presence of locomotor dysfunction following the intrathecal co-administration of APV and CP.
RESULTS: Neither CNQX nor AP3 reduced the MAC of isoflurane. APV at 0.01 microg plus CP at 1 microg, as well as APV at 0.1 microg plus CP at 10 microg, reduced the MAC of isoflurane, with respective reductions of 7.6% and 14%; (P<0.05). Co-administration of NMDA plus SP reversed the decrease in the MAC of isoflurane. Locomotive activity was not changed.
CONCLUSIONS: The NMDA receptor and the NK-1 receptor are important determinants of the MAC of isoflurane, exerting this influence by inhibition of pain transmission in the spinal cord, while mGlu and AMPA receptors have no effect on the MAC of isoflurane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10456816     DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.1999.430711.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  6 in total

1.  Sensitivity to isoflurane anesthesia increases in autism spectrum disorder Shank3+/∆c mutant mouse model.

Authors:  Changsheng Li; Michele Schaefer; Christy Gray; Ya Yang; Orion Furmanski; Sufang Liu; Paul Worley; C David Mintz; Feng Tao; Roger A Johns
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.763

2.  Regional differences in the effects of isoflurane on neurotransmitter release.

Authors:  Robert I Westphalen; No-Bong Kwak; Keir Daniels; Hugh C Hemmings
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 5.250

3.  GABA(A) positive modulator and NMDA antagonist-like discriminative stimulus effects of isoflurane vapor in mice.

Authors:  Keith L Shelton; Katherine L Nicholson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Acid-induced mesenteric hyperemia in rats: role of CGRP, substance P, prostaglandin, adenosine, and histamine.

Authors:  Felix W Leung; Fumihiro Iwata; Kyoji Seno; Joseph W C Leung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Is a new paradigm needed to explain how inhaled anesthetics produce immobility?

Authors:  Edmond I Eger; Douglas E Raines; Steven L Shafer; Hugh C Hemmings; James M Sonner
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 6.  Effects of General Anesthetics on Synaptic Transmission and Plasticity.

Authors:  Jimcy Platholi; Hugh C Hemmings
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 7.708

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.