Literature DB >> 10456282

Effects on voice by endolaryngeal microsurgery.

V Uloza1.   

Abstract

Endolaryngeal microsurgery (EM) is functionally oriented. Therefore, assessment of vocal function is important to evaluate the effect of the surgery on voice. In all, 58 patients, including 26 patients with vocal cord nodules and 32 patients with vocal cord polyps, underwent EM. The patients' voices were recorded and analyzed before EM and 2 weeks after. Analysis of voice quality included perceptual assessment and each patient's own subjective evaluation of social acceptability of voice according to the 10.0 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) scale. Acoustic voice signal data were measured for fundamental frequency (Fo), jitter, shimmer and normalized noise energy (NNE) using Tiger Electronics Dr. Speech software. Statistically significant (P < 0.001) improvement was achieved in both perceptual and acoustic analysis and in both patient groups. According to the VAS scale, a high degree of satisfaction with the surgery was achieved. The grade of hoarseness (G) as well as roughness (R) and breathiness (B) decreased significantly after the operation. EM resulted in a statistically significant decrease in the mean jitter, shimmer and NNE postoperatively. There were no significant changes in the Fo after EM. These results confirm a high degree of effectiveness of EM on vocal rehabilitation and meet the expectations regarding the assessment and documentation of postsurgical voice changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10456282     DOI: 10.1007/s004050050253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  6 in total

1.  Clinical value of acoustic voice measures: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Katrin Werth; Daniel Voigt; Michael Döllinger; Ulrich Eysholdt; Jörg Lohscheller
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Pedunculated polyp removal by means of larynx fiberendoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Alberto Vegas; Ignacio Cobeta; Andrés Micó; Teresa Rivera
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Objective acoustic analysis of pathological voices from patients with vocal nodules and polyps.

Authors:  Jack J Jiang; Yu Zhang; Julia MacCallum; Alicia Sprecher; Liang Zhou
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 0.849

4.  Effect of Septoplasty on Voice Quality: A Prospective-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Safak Gulec; Ismail Kulahli; Mehmet Ilhan Sahin; Kerem Kokoğlu; Murat Salih Gunes; Deniz Avci; Turan Arli
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 3.372

5.  A questionnaire using vocal symptoms in quality control of phonosurgery: vocal surgical questionnaire.

Authors:  Aleksander Grande Hansen; Chi Zhang; Jens Øyvind Loven; Hanne Berdal-Sørensen; Magnus TarAngen; Rolf Haye
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2018-06-15

6.  Changes in a Daily Phonotrauma Index After Laryngeal Surgery and Voice Therapy: Implications for the Role of Daily Voice Use in the Etiology and Pathophysiology of Phonotraumatic Vocal Hyperfunction.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Andrew J Ortiz; James A Burns; Katherine L Marks; Laura E Toles; Tara Stadelman-Cohen; Carol Krusemark; Jason Muise; Tiffiny Hron; Steven M Zeitels; Annie B Fox; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.297

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.