Literature DB >> 10456076

Conditioned visual flight orientation in Drosophila: dependence on age, practice, and diet.

A Guo1, L Li, S Z Xia, C H Feng, R Wolf, M Heisenberg.   

Abstract

Orientation preferences for visual patterns can be conditioned in tethered flies (Drosophila melanogaster) at the flight simulator. In a reversal conditioning procedure using heat as reinforcement, flies can be trained to successively prefer different flight orientations with respect to the patterns. As in many learning paradigms, conditioned responses are highly variable. Although during training most flies reliably avoid the heat and the corresponding flight orientations, in subsequent learning tests without heat some show no consistent preference for the permissive orientations. We have started to investigate the interindividual differences in learning performance and describe here three significant variables: the age of the animals, their experience in the flight simulator prior to the experiment, and the composition of the fly food. Flies learn more reliably at 3-4 days than at 1-2 days of age but learning indices do not increase further in even older flies. Learning is improved if flies are allowed to become familiar with the flight simulator before the start of the conditioning procedure. Most important, poor nutrition causes complete amnesia within three or four generations. The reverse shift from poor to nutritious food restores learning ability with an even longer delay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 10456076     DOI: 10.1101/lm.3.1.49

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  49 in total

1.  Memories in drosophila heat-box learning.

Authors:  Gabriele Putz; Martin Heisenberg
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Genetic dissociation of acquisition and memory strength in the heat-box spatial learning paradigm in Drosophila.

Authors:  Soeren Diegelmann; Melissa Zars; Troy Zars
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Different parameters support generalization and discrimination learning in Drosophila at the flight simulator.

Authors:  Björn Brembs; Natalie Hempel de Ibarra
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Reinforcement pre-exposure enhances spatial memory formation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Divya Sitaraman; Melissa Zars; Troy Zars
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  High and low temperatures have unequal reinforcing properties in Drosophila spatial learning.

Authors:  Melissa Zars; Troy Zars
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Experience improves feature extraction in Drosophila.

Authors:  Yueqing Peng; Wang Xi; Wei Zhang; Ke Zhang; Aike Guo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Drosophila mushroom bodies are dispensable for visual, tactile, and motor learning.

Authors:  R Wolf; T Wittig; L Liu; G Wustmann; D Eyding; M Heisenberg
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  AKAPS act in a two-step mechanism of memory acquisition.

Authors:  Lisa Scheunemann; Philipp Skroblin; Christian Hundsrucker; Enno Klussmann; Marina Efetova; Martin Schwärzel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Long noncoding RNA SMRG regulates Drosophila macrochaetes by antagonizing scute through E(spl)mβ.

Authors:  Mengbo Xu; Yuanhang Xiang; Xiaojun Liu; Baoyan Bai; Runsheng Chen; Li Liu; Meixia Li
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 4.652

10.  Distinct memories of odor intensity and quality in Drosophila.

Authors:  Pavel Masek; Martin Heisenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-29       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.